Prev: Algorithm for Twin Primes?
Next: I chose the term "Effective" as nearing the antonym of "Antonym" to fit the string in NP-Crypt
From: Archimedes Plutonium on 19 May 2010 10:07

One of the first astro bodies to be Eclipse tested to really see if
these bodies are moving towards us for a Doppler blueshift is that of
Andromeda galaxy and the Barnard star in
the Milky Way. Both, allegedly blueshifted and thus implying that they
are moving
towards Earth.

But with my Fiberglass Experiment that a redshift can occur on white
light headlights
coming towards me.

So what would it take for the Hubble Space Telescope to draw that
final last slender
line on Andromeda and Barnard star to eclipse them. Then wait a week
or month or
year, repeat the eclipse procedure and see if either one breached the
former eclipse?
If either one does breach the former eclipse, then the blueshift is
truthful that these
two objects are really moving towards Earth. But if it comes to pass
that upon
repeating the eclipse, that the second eclipse is a decreasing
eclipse, means that
the astro body is moving away from Earth and that we have the
blueshift confused
with something else.

Now from my reading of the astro literature, the quasars are fuzzy
images but that
they are testable to the eclipse test. So that if we were to eclipse a
highly redshifted
quasar and wait a month or year and repeat the eclipse, would we find
those quasars
are really moving away? Or what I suspect they are moving towards
Earth.

Archimedes Plutonium
http://www.iw.net/~a_plutonium/
whole entire Universe is just one big atom
where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies
From: Enrico on 19 May 2010 18:43
On May 19, 8:07 am, Archimedes Plutonium
<plutonium.archime...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> One of the first astro bodies to be Eclipse tested to really see if
> these bodies are moving towards us for a Doppler blueshift is that of
> Andromeda galaxy and the Barnard star in
> the Milky Way. Both, allegedly blueshifted and thus implying that they
> are moving
> towards Earth.
>
> But with my Fiberglass Experiment that a redshift can occur on white
> light headlights
> coming towards me.
>
> So what would it take for the Hubble Space Telescope to draw that
> final last slender
> line on Andromeda and Barnard star to eclipse them. Then wait a week
> or month or
> year, repeat the eclipse procedure and see if either one breached the
> former eclipse?
> If either one does breach the former eclipse, then the blueshift is
> truthful that these
> two objects are really moving towards Earth. But if it comes to pass
> that upon
> repeating the eclipse, that the second eclipse is a decreasing
> eclipse, means that
> the astro body is moving away from Earth and that we have the
> blueshift confused
> with something else.
>
> Now from my reading of the astro literature, the quasars are fuzzy
> images but that
> they are testable to the eclipse test. So that if we were to eclipse a
> highly redshifted
> quasar and wait a month or year and repeat the eclipse, would we find
> those quasars
> are really moving away? Or what I suspect they are moving towards
> Earth.
>
> Archimedes Plutoniumhttp://www.iw.net/~a_plutonium/
> whole entire Universe is just one big atom
> where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies

=============================================================

Measuring Size from Images:
A wrangle with angles and image scale
Purpose:
To learn how to make measurements of angular size on images from
MicroObservatory telescopes.

http://www.cfa.harvard.edu/webscope/activities/pdfs/measureSize.PDF


Angular Size Calculator

http://www.1728.com/angsize.htm



Enrico
 | 
Pages: 1
Prev: Algorithm for Twin Primes?
Next: I chose the term "Effective" as nearing the antonym of "Antonym" to fit the string in NP-Crypt