Prev: As I Was Being Plowed...(How to Get A Script Approved.)
Next: Dirac was both right and wrong about his magnetic monopole Chapt 14 #184; ATOM TOTALITY
From: Koobee Wublee on 21 Jun 2010 00:56
On Jun 20, 5:58 pm, Arindam Banerjee wrote:

> Good morning, all honest folk.

Is this the same Ari some Indian dude who thinks that India has been
raped to the bones by the British empire is the best thing for India?

> The "proof" for General Relativity is the famous solar eclipse
> experiement. [mundane knowledge snipped]
>
> And indeed that was shown to be the case! [and more icing on the cake snipped]

It was shown so indirectly to be the case. <shrug>

> Lots of mathematical mumbo-jumbo
> leading to the supposed existence of black holes, followed in due
> course.

The black holes are the manifestations of a particular solution to the
set of field equations in vacuum that are static, spherically
symmetric, and asymptotically flat. There are plenty of vacuum
solutions that are static, spherically symmetric, and asymptotically
flat and also degenerate into Newtonian results that do not manifest
black holes. So, it helps if one actually tries to study the field
equations. Hey, don't feel so bad that you did not. All self-styled
physicists did not either. <shrug>

> But what was really happening? The light from the stars bent in the
> atmosphere extending way beyond the rim of the Sun, due to the simple
> process of refraction. [...]

Not quite.

Newtonian mechanics also allows photons to be deflected at half of
GR's geometric result, but that is so if photons are treated like a
classical particle with no speed limit. Since then, electromagnetism
has been characterized in which light as waves cannot possibly be
deflected by a gravitational mass. However, with the advent of
electromagnetism, the Aether must exist where a gravitational mass is
capable of manifesting a true gravitational lens with the speed of
light increasing if moving away from the gravitational mass. You can
then apply Snell's law to obtain the same Newtonian deflected amount.
<shrug>

The 1919 expeditions led by Eddington did not have the technology
required in the precision to determine the photon deflection. As one
of the fist Einstein Dingleberries, Eddington basically concluded GR's
(namely the Schwarzschild metric only) favor without analyzing the
data any further.

Modern determination of photon deflection calls out for time delay
which is the difference in time between a straight path versus a
deflected path. So, if the Schwarzschild metric gives two nibbles of
deflection in geometry, the expected time delay would be also two
nibbles since the deflected path is longer by also two nibbles over
the straight path. Thus, by detecting time delay, one can indirectly
determine the amount of geometric deflection. So, an observed time
delay of two nibbles should be construed as two nibbles of geometric
deflection.

Well, the Schwarzschild metric exhibits another surprise in which the
self-styled physicists have neglected in the past 100 years. That is
the gravitational time dilation. In a straight path, the
gravitational time dilation from the Schwarzschild metric is expected
to manifest one nibble of time delay. Thus, the Schwarzschild metric
including both the geometric deflection and gravitational time
dilation should actually yield three nibbles of time delay.

Well, all experimental results since Shapiro's monumental works in the
60's have consistently demonstrated two nibbles of delay. This is
actually not what the Schwarzschild metric has predicted of three
nibbles. It is also not what the Newtonian mechanics has predicted of
one nibble without gravitational time dilation. It can be what three
Aether model of a gravitational lens with gravitational time dilation
has predicted of two nibbles. <shrug>
From: Arindam Banerjee on 21 Jun 2010 04:41
On Jun 21, 2:56 pm, Koobee Wublee <koobee.wub...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> On Jun 20, 5:58 pm, Arindam Banerjee wrote:
>
> > Good morning, all honest folk.
>
> Is this the same Ari some Indian dude who thinks that India has been
> raped to the bones by the British empire is the best thing for India?

Fool, I only wrote some facts no genuine Indian ever bothers to
contest.

From: Arindam Banerjee on 22 Jun 2010 01:51
rotten thug
 | 
Pages: 1
Prev: As I Was Being Plowed...(How to Get A Script Approved.)
Next: Dirac was both right and wrong about his magnetic monopole Chapt 14 #184; ATOM TOTALITY