Electron’s puzzles.
in [Relativity]
|
Prev: SR Exercise
Next: Prime Number Sums reveal both a 2D and 3D pattern when stepped by the golden ratio logarithm!
From: socratus on 23 Apr 2010 01:48 Electron cannot be composite particle. But it obeys a whole slew of physical laws, including: * the electrostatic interaction * the weak interaction * the gravitational interaction * the interaction with the Higgs field * the law of conservation of momentum * the law of conservation of angular momentum * the law of conservation of energy * the law of conservation of lepton number * Fermi-Dirac statistics .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . And electron obeys more three Laws a) The Law of conservation and transformation energy/ mass b) The Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle / Law c) The Pauli Exclusion Principle/ Law And it has five (5) formulas: E=h*f , e= +ah*c , e= -ah*c., +E=Mc^2 and -E=Mc^2. All these factors must say: electron isnt as a simple elementary as we are thinking. ====================. S On Apr 22, 4:00 pm, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > On Apr 22, 3:11 am, socratus <isra...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > More than ten different models of the electron are presented here. > > (!!!) > > More than twenty models are discussed briefly. (!!!) > > Thus, the book gives a complete picture of contemporary theoretical > > thinking (traditional and new) about the physics of the electron. > > / The book "What is the Electron?" > > Volodimir Simulik. Montreal, Canada. 2005. /http://redshift.vif.com/BookBlurbs/Electron.htm > > > All of them are problematical. > > So, why we call an electron a simple elementary > > particle if it looks not very simple ? > > It is simple because it appears not to be composite, as far as we can > tell. > Other than that, it is like a bunch of other simple particles, in that > it obeys a whole slew of physical laws, including: > * the electrostatic interaction > * the weak interaction > * the gravitational interaction > * the interaction with the Higgs field > * the law of conservation of momentum > * the law of conservation of angular momentum > * the law of conservation of energy > * the law of conservation of lepton number > * Fermi-Dirac statistics > > and so on. > > > > > We can read hundreds books about philosophy of physics. > > But how can we trust them if we dont have the real model of > > Electron ? > > It is real. Just because there is more than one law that pertains to > electrons doesn't mean they are unbelievable. > > > > > > > =====================. > > S- Hide quoted text - >
From: BURT on 23 Apr 2010 02:16
On Apr 22, 10:48 pm, socratus <isra...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > Electron cannot be composite particle. > But it obeys a whole slew of physical laws, including: > * the electrostatic interaction > * the weak interaction > * the gravitational interaction > * the interaction with the Higgs field > * the law of conservation of momentum > * the law of conservation of angular momentum > * the law of conservation of energy > * the law of conservation of lepton number > * Fermi-Dirac statistics > . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . > And electron obeys more three Laws > a) The Law of conservation and transformation energy/ mass > b) The Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle / Law > c) The Pauli Exclusion Principle/ Law > And it has five (5) formulas: E=h*f , e= +ah*c , e= -ah*c., > +E=Mc^2 and -E=Mc^2. > > All these factors must say: > electron isnt as a simple elementary as we are thinking. > ====================. > S > > On Apr 22, 4:00 pm, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > On Apr 22, 3:11 am, socratus <isra...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > More than ten different models of the electron are presented here. > > > (!!!) > > > More than twenty models are discussed briefly. (!!!) > > > Thus, the book gives a complete picture of contemporary theoretical > > > thinking (traditional and new) about the physics of the electron. > > > / The book "What is the Electron?" > > > Volodimir Simulik. Montreal, Canada. 2005. /http://redshift..vif.com/BookBlurbs/Electron.htm > > > > All of them are problematical. > > > So, why we call an electron a simple elementary > > > particle if it looks not very simple ? > > > It is simple because it appears not to be composite, as far as we can > > tell. > > Other than that, it is like a bunch of other simple particles, in that > > it obeys a whole slew of physical laws, including: > > * the electrostatic interaction > > * the weak interaction > > * the gravitational interaction > > * the interaction with the Higgs field > > * the law of conservation of momentum > > * the law of conservation of angular momentum > > * the law of conservation of energy > > * the law of conservation of lepton number > > * Fermi-Dirac statistics > > > and so on. > > > > We can read hundreds books about philosophy of physics. > > > But how can we trust them if we dont have the real model of > > > Electron ? > > > It is real. Just because there is more than one law that pertains to > > electrons doesn't mean they are unbelievable. > > > > =====================. > > > S- Hide quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - Matter is C squared energy infinitely dense point particle that we call mass. Mitch Raemsch |