Electrostatics and absurdities of modern physics
in [Physics]
|
From: sorin on 5 Jun 2010 11:09 Electrostatics and absurdities of modern physics For more then two centuries scientists have been used Coulomb law without questioning its validity. Based on well known experimental facts the presented text advocate for a limited validity of Coulomb law; this is pedagogical fact in order to not scare too many actual orthodox physicists. Further work will clearly tackle with the nature of Coulomb force and its place inside electricity theory. Second subject takes intro discussion the working principle for common capacitors and supra capacitors. Despite their wide spread use as electric and electronic components, their actual explanation for whats happen inside such device at atomic level are a monument of absurdity. The link: http://www.elkadot.com/en/magneticity/Electrostatic.htm Starting with this point the advertisement will be directed for a larger category of readers not only to English speakers. All the time, the Romanian version of the text will serve as reference. The link: http://www.elkadot.com/ro/magneticitate/Electrostatica.htm Except Romanian version, all other variants can present some translation errors. In order to cover the intellectuals rights, the Romanian and English texts will appear first because are written by me. The variants in other languages (French, German, Spanish, etc) will appear few weeks later, when their translations are finished. All translations are made by amateur so if a reader is not con content with a specific translation, he/she can make appeal to Romanian reference text and to search for a better translator. If there are persons willing to help translation in other languages please contact me by email. Best regards, Sorin Cosofret
From: Uncle Al on 5 Jun 2010 12:24 sorin wrote: > > Electrostatics and absurdities of modern physics 1) "Zur Elektrodynamik bewegter K�rper" 2) Jackson. 3) idiot What part of electrodynamics does not work as its wholly contained subset electrostatics? idiot > Sorin Cosofret So sad. -- Uncle Al http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/ (Toxic URL! Unsafe for children and most mammals) http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/qz4.htm
From: Sam Wormley on 5 Jun 2010 12:46 On 6/5/10 10:09 AM, sorin wrote: > Electrostatics and absurdities of modern physics > > For more then two centuries scientists have been used Coulomb law > without questioning its validity. Do some self education, Sorin http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/physics/Administrivia/booklist.html#classical-electromagnetism > Classical Electromagnetism > > Jackson: Classical Electrodynamics, 2nd ed., 1975 > Intermediate to advanced, the definitive graduate(US)/undergraduate(UK) text. > Purcell: Berkeley Physics Series Vol 2. > You can't beat this for the intelligent, reasonably sophisticated beginning physics student. He tells you on the very first page about the experimental proof of how charge does not vary with speed. > plus... Chen, Min, Berkeley Physics problems with solutions. > Reitz, Milford and Christy: Foundations of Electromagnetic Theory 4th ed., 1992 > Undergraduate level. Pretty difficult to learn from at first, but good reference, for some calculations involving stacks of thin films and their reflectance and transmission properties, for e.g. It's a good, rigorous text as far as it goes, which is pretty far, but not all the way. For example, they have a great section on optical properties of a single thin film between two dielectric semi-infinite media, but no generalization to stacks of films. > Feynman: Feynman Lectures, vol 2 > Lorrain & Corson: Electromagnetism, Principles and Applications, 1979 > Resnick and Halliday: Physics, vol 2, 4th ed., 1993 > Igor Irodov: Problems in Physics Excellent and extensive collection of EM problems for undergrads. > William Smythe: Static and Dynamic Electricity, 3rd ed., 1968 > For the extreme masochists. Some of the most hair-raising EM problems you'll ever see. Definitely not for the weak-of-heart. > Landau, Lifschitz, and Pitaevskii: Electrodynamics of Continuous Media, 2nd ed., 1984 > Same level as Jackson and with lots of material not in Jackson. > Marion and Heald: Classical Electromagnetic Radiation, 2nd ed., 1980 > undergraduate or low-level graduate level >
From: Benj on 5 Jun 2010 17:51 On Jun 5, 12:24 pm, Uncle Al <Uncle...(a)hate.spam.net> wrote: > sorin wrote: > > Electrostatics and absurdities of modern physics > > 1) "Zur Elektrodynamik bewegter K rper" Coulomb's law does not work for moving bodies. Uncle Al NOT "smarter than Einstein"! > 2) Jackson. Coulomb's law does not apply to time-dependent phenomena. Jackson (as well as all of science including Uncle Al) doesn't have a CLUE what "charge" is. Where the forces between charges come from. What the nature of such forces are. How such forces propagate in time and why. > 3) idiot > > What part of electrodynamics does not work as its wholly contained > subset electrostatics? I'll give you a break seeing as how you are only a chemist and not expected to know any science. But you have it backwards. Electrostatics is a subset of electrodynamics. Electrodynamics does not work as electrostatics. Uncle Al. To prove how "smart" you are please give a simple model for "charge" to the rest of us and explain how electrostatic forces as described by Coulomb's law arise from it. (You may assume time dependence is negligible) Idiot!
From: Benj on 5 Jun 2010 17:58 On Jun 5, 12:46 pm, Sam Wormley <sworml...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > On 6/5/10 10:09 AM, sorin wrote: > > > Electrostatics and absurdities of modern physics > > > For more then two centuries scientists have been used Coulomb law > > without questioning its validity. > > Do some self education, Sorin As usual "Preacher Sam" has to thump his bible and pretend that it holds all mankind's answers. He can't explain any better than anyone else what "charge" is, but yet he insists that everyone else is stoopid and needs to "read a book". Coulomb's Law is not a general law. Idiot. So why is Science as Sorin asserts filled with "absurdities"? That can easily be answered with the following rule: Rule: Whenever a set of logical circumstances comes to an absurd conclusion, you can be SURE politics is involved! "Preacher Sam" is the best example of an application of that rule that I've seen.
|
Pages: 1 Prev: The oil spill in perspective Next: Listen up, physics cripples |