From: Mickel on
"D Yuniskis" <not.going.to.be(a)seen.com> wrote in message
news:hn97lc$7hf$2(a)speranza.aioe.org...
> And *none* of the users who own this device have *ever* run
> a virus scanner??

*Surely* this trojan didn't actually do anything. If it started calling out
on port 7777 someone would have noticed.


From: D Yuniskis on
Mickel wrote:
> "D Yuniskis" <not.going.to.be(a)seen.com> wrote in message
> news:hn97lc$7hf$2(a)speranza.aioe.org...
>> And *none* of the users who own this device have *ever* run
>> a virus scanner??
>
> *Surely* this trojan didn't actually do anything. If it started calling out
> on port 7777 someone would have noticed.

How do you know it calls *out* and doesn't just open 7777 and
*wait* for an incoming connection?

Regardless, a virus scan would/should have noticed the payload.
From: Mickel on
"D Yuniskis" <not.going.to.be(a)seen.com> wrote in message
news:hn9g1s$jk6$1(a)speranza.aioe.org...
> How do you know it calls *out* and doesn't just open 7777 and
> *wait* for an incoming connection?

Possibly but considering even basic home routers have nat these days it
wouldn't be very effective. So pretty much it would do nothing.

> Regardless, a virus scan would/should have noticed the payload.

Why? Unless it is a know virus it's unlikely to get picked up.


From: Przemek Klosowski on
On Wed, 10 Mar 2010 16:01:38 -0700, D Yuniskis wrote:

> Don McKenzie wrote:
>> Energizer USB Duo battery charger hides a Trojan March 9, 2010 by Lin

> And *none* of the users who own this device have *ever* run a virus
> scanner??

A virus scanner only detects the viruses that match a known signature, or
which do something that it knows about. If the malware is stealthy enough
it won't be detected.
From: D Yuniskis on
Mickel wrote:
> "D Yuniskis" <not.going.to.be(a)seen.com> wrote in message
> news:hn9g1s$jk6$1(a)speranza.aioe.org...
>> How do you know it calls *out* and doesn't just open 7777 and
>> *wait* for an incoming connection?
>
> Possibly but considering even basic home routers have nat these days it
> wouldn't be very effective. So pretty much it would do nothing.
>
>> Regardless, a virus scan would/should have noticed the payload.
>
> Why? Unless it is a know virus it's unlikely to get picked up.

In two years it remained hidden?
No one ever ran TCPview?