Prev: Iarnrod proven correct again as * Hates US * FAILS to change subject line, admitting Iarnrod's correctness: It is physically impossible, of course, for 9/11 to be an "inside job"
Next: Against religion and science until both admit they are wrong
From: Y.Porat on 9 Aug 2010 10:50 On Aug 9, 10:25 am, "Autymn D. C." <lysde...(a)sbcglobal.net> wrote: > On Aug 7, 8:35 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > On Aug 7, 8:09 pm, Jacko <jackokr...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > LT system only M=constant scaling of T.L^-2 > > > Mass is a Point energy of the small and infinitely dense. > > Spread out energy does not weigh like mass or point energy. > > bullshit--Newton's, Coulomb's, and Yukawa's potentials ------------------ so ??? do you agree with my above op claim TIA Y.Porat --------------------------
From: BURT on 11 Aug 2010 17:58 On Aug 9, 1:25 am, "Autymn D. C." <lysde...(a)sbcglobal.net> wrote: > On Aug 7, 8:35 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > On Aug 7, 8:09 pm, Jacko <jackokr...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > LT system only M=constant scaling of T.L^-2 > > > Mass is a Point energy of the small and infinitely dense. > > Spread out energy does not weigh like mass or point energy. > > bullshit--Newton's, Coulomb's, and Yukawa's potentials No. Einstein said mass is concentrated energy. Mass is infinitely dense energy. Its size is the infinitely small quantum. Spread out energy is a form that is not mass and does not weigh. Mitch Raemsch
From: Han on 12 Aug 2010 05:52 On Aug 8, 4:14 am, "Y.Porat" <y.y.po...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > 1 > E =m c^2 > 2 > and as i proved unequivocally > that Energy has mass - the only mass! > > as i proved it in many ways > the most obvious is by the momentum of photons > > M photon= hf/c > there is mass there > and noting relativistic there !!! > just the one kind of mass that exists > > (there is the MKS system > not ''''M1 M2 M 3 K S """ system > > therefore we can come to the conclusion that > > PARTICLES AND ENERGY - ARE REVERSIBLE- > CHANGEABLE !! > > in simple words > particles can become energy > and energy can become massive particles !! > > ie > energy can become a massive particle > not only the monster Higgs (Schmiggs ) > > -- yet actually endless number of particles > that has the only mass (not relativistic mass > ---just mass !! > 3 > no mass -the only mass - no real physics !!! > and it can be done > > NOT ONLY THROUGH JUST ONE PROCESS- > BUT A LOT OF PROCESSES !! > in a similar parallel way -- that > particles can be changed to Energy > in many process ways > > copyright > Y.Porat > 8-8- 2010 > > ATB > Y.Porat > ------------------------------ Well,..., do you mean e.g. the nuclear fusion process? E=m (take c=1 that writes a lot easier) happens there. m becomes photon but the process is not such that *any* m can spontaneously become a photon or a whatnot. How much of the m=f (h=1 too) is similar to energy bookkeeping how much of it is real observable (beable John Bell would say) ? Sorry if I do not understand what you are talking about.
From: Autymn D. C. on 12 Aug 2010 08:03
On Aug 11, 2:58 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > On Aug 9, 1:25 am, "Autymn D. C." <lysde...(a)sbcglobal.net> wrote: > > > On Aug 7, 8:35 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > On Aug 7, 8:09 pm, Jacko <jackokr...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > LT system only M=constant scaling of T.L^-2 > > > > Mass is a Point energy of the small and infinitely dense. > > > Spread out energy does not weigh like mass or point energy. > > > bullshit--Newton's, Coulomb's, and Yukawa's potentials > > No. Einstein said mass is concentrated energy. Mass is infinitely > dense energy. Its size is the infinitely small quantum. Spread out > energy is a form that is not mass and does not weigh. Concentrated means there's a barýcentron. http://google.com/groups?q=gigalihtyears |