Prev: Alerting Chinese characters - can it be done?
Next: page got cleaned up and now it doesn't display in IE 7
From: lam on 6 Jul 2010 05:40 Hi, It is stated in the developer's manual that all classes with onmoduleload() must implement implements EntryPoint. However, I tried to run a project without this and it worked. Is it nessesary or recomended? Thank you
From: Richard Cornford on 6 Jul 2010 06:43 On Jul 6, 10:40 am, lam wrote: > Hi, > It is stated in the developer's manual that all classes with > onmoduleload() must implement implements EntryPoint. Javascript doesn't have classes (or it only has one class, depending on how you want to look at it), and there isn't (to the best of my knowledge) any developer's manual for the language (certainly not an officially sanctioned one for ECMAScript). > However, I tried to run a project without this and it worked. > Is it nessesary or recomended? You are either asking this question in the wrong place or failing to be anywhere near specific enough about what it is your question relates to. Richard.
From: Lasse Reichstein Nielsen on 6 Jul 2010 11:34 lam <lama.ghusn(a)gmail.com> writes: > It is stated in the developer's manual that all classes with > onmoduleload() must implement implements EntryPoint. > However, I tried to run a project without this and it worked. > Is it nessesary or recomended? I assume you are talking about a GWT project. GWT is outside the scope of this group, so you are unlikely to get a useful response here. A few minutes of google'ing suggests to me that it's possible to make GWT modules without any EntryPoint (and, indeed, reusable library modules are likely to have no EntryPoints). (That's starting from zero knowledge of what an EntryPoint is, so don't trust me on that :) You can try asking for more details at the GWT group (http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit?pli=1) /L -- Lasse Reichstein Holst Nielsen 'Javascript frameworks is a disruptive technology'
From: Garrett Smith on 7 Jul 2010 00:26
On 2010-07-06 06:54 PM, Garrett Smith wrote: > On 2010-07-06 08:34 AM, Lasse Reichstein Nielsen wrote: >> lam<lama.ghusn(a)gmail.com> writes: >> [...] > Instead, read the RTM, Badly edited, sorry. |