Prev: "NaN".to_f revisited
Next: [ANN] Inochi 5.0.2
From: botp on 10 Aug 2010 22:18 On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 10:51 PM, Matt Mencel <MR-Mencel(a)wiu.edu> wrote: > Another reason for me to dislike Solaris SPARC. you may let ruby do the work for you :) try ruby 1.9 eg, $ ruby -ve 'puts("#{(-1.size==4?32:64)}bit", Time.at(4102380000))' ruby 1.9.2dev (2010-07-11 revision 28618) [i686-linux] 32bit 2099-12-31 14:00:00 +0800 best regards -botp
From: Matt Mencel on 11 Aug 2010 10:12 Solaris 10 SPARC is 64bit. It may be the ruby version I have installed was compiled for 32bit? It's an older version of 1.8.7 off of sunfreeware.com. I noticed that sunfreeware has a newer 1.9.1 version available there now so I think I'll upgrade ruby to 1.9.1 and see what happens. Thanks, Matt ----- Original Message ----- From: "botp" <botpena(a)gmail.com> To: "ruby-talk ML" <ruby-talk(a)ruby-lang.org> Sent: Tuesday, August 10, 2010 9:18:30 PM Subject: Re: Error: Bignum too big to convert into `long' On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 10:51 PM, Matt Mencel <MR-Mencel(a)wiu.edu> wrote: > Another reason for me to dislike Solaris SPARC. you may let ruby do the work for you :) try ruby 1.9 eg, $ ruby -ve 'puts("#{(-1.size==4?32:64)}bit", Time.at(4102380000))' ruby 1.9.2dev (2010-07-11 revision 28618) [i686-linux] 32bit 2099-12-31 14:00:00 +0800 best regards -botp
From: Brian Candler on 11 Aug 2010 10:27 Matt Mencel wrote: > Solaris 10 SPARC is 64bit. It may be the ruby version I have installed > was compiled for 32bit? It's an older version of 1.8.7 off of > sunfreeware.com. I noticed that sunfreeware has a newer 1.9.1 version > available there now so I think I'll upgrade ruby to 1.9.1 and see what > happens. Remember that ruby 1.9 is a significantly different language to ruby 1.8. Unless you are lucky, or fancy modifying your app to work with 1.9 (and maybe its dependent libs too), I think you'd be better off finding a 64-bit build of ruby 1.8.7. -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.
|
Pages: 1 Prev: "NaN".to_f revisited Next: [ANN] Inochi 5.0.2 |