From: Archimedes Plutonium on 30 Jul 2010 13:26 Archimedes Plutonium wrote: > Looks like I invented some new terms here of: > (a) ReCalculus to signify the strip-building rather than the > decomposition into picket-fences > of Calculus. I looked up the word "calculus" and surprized to find it is a Latin word that meant "a small stone used for counting". I have to check into that some more to see exactly what is meant by that. I also looked to see if the ancient Romans had a picket fence and a word for picket fence. > (b) Pseudocircle to signify the name of the object formed from the > circle inside a square > and which is put together as a 4 pointed star shape. > Now this is where it gets really interesting in that the pseudocircle and pseudosphere are derived from the surface of the circle or sphere from which they came from and so are involved with "pi", but if we tamper with the pseudocircle and pseudosphere in a unique tampering we convert the "pi form of pseudocircle" and the "pi form of pseudosphere" into a logarthmic form, an "e" form of pseudocircle and "e" form of pseudosphere. > But an interesting question is whether the 2D pseudocircle is related > to the circle by the > same percentage of area as the 3D pseudosphere formed from the nested > inside sphere > and the residue of the cube? > > So for a square of side equal to 2 and the circle inside of radius 1, > we have the square > as area of 4 and the circle of area 3.14... which means the total > residue area of 4-3.14 > of 0.86. So the circle takes up 3.14/4 = 79% of the area. > > For the cube of side 2 would have a volume of 8, and the sphere would > have a volume of > 4/3 pi r^3 of approx 4.18. So the volume of the sphere is about 52% of > the volume of cube > leaving the residue which is the pseudosphere to be 48% of the volume > of the cube. > > Now the surface area of the cube is 6 x 4 = 24, and the sphere surface > area is 4 pi r^2 > which is 12.56 and the surface area of the pseudosphere is also 12.56 > for it is just the contours of the sphere surface area. So this leaves > us with an interesting question as to how we have more surface area, > and obviously surface area is not conserved. And tells us a bit about > conservation laws in physics. We have conservation of volume in 3D but > lose conservation of surface area in 3D. > This above is the major new mathematics of this millenium and the next. For here we have the actual assemblage of mathematics as a part of physics. In Physics, it is Quantum Mechanics that pulls together all of physics. And the essential aspect of QM is that existence is both particle and wave. Physics is duality and duality is both particle and wave. We have this idea or concept repeated in mathematics in that math in whole is both geometry and arithmetic. And inside geometry we have this duality also in that Geometry is both Elliptic and Hyperbolic and when the two are considered as one, it is Euclidean. So we have the famous formula: Euclidean Geometry = Elliptic geometry unioned with Hyperbolic geometry and this is also in physics: Quantum Mechanics = particle unioned wave Elliptic geometry is always a "closed" geometry and so it is a particle aspect of nature. Hyperbolic geometry is a "open ended" geometry and is thus the wave nature of reality. Given any closed Euclidean figure or object, we can see nested inside the closed figure such as a cube, we can see a sphere inside and what is not the sphere is the residue which when assembled so as to remove all straight line segments we have a Hyperbolic figure, but based on "pi". We must now convert that figure to be based upon "e". Now "pi" and "e" are related since they come from the fact that the Universe is one big atom of plutonium 231Pu, and this atom has 22 subshells inside of 7 shells and only 19 occupied subshells in any instant of time, so we have 22/7 and 19/7. If the Universe were an atom of helium then our values of "pi" and "e" would be closer to the values of 1 and 2 and not 2 and 3. Since "pi and e" are related, then we convert the residue of the cube and the residue of the square and the residue of all Euclidean closed objects from their "pi based residue" to their "e based residue". Archimedes Plutonium http://www.iw.net/~a_plutonium/ whole entire Universe is just one big atom where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies
|
Pages: 1 Prev: universe a musical scale Next: Second postulate an Einstein |