Exe File Information
in [Freeware]
|
Prev: The real Chrome threat to Firefox
Next: If You Wonder
From: Gordon Darling on 19 Jun 2010 19:32 On Sat, 19 Jun 2010 18:25:00 +0000, Bear Bottoms wrote: <snip> > You guys always make a fuss. It was probably some harmless spyware. Wow! A whole new category of Bearware. When can we expect in-depth, "well researched" reviews of the new freeware category of "harmless spyware" -- ox·y·mo·ron n. pl. ox·y·mo·ra or ox·y·mo·rons A rhetorical figure in which incongruous or contradictory terms are combined, as in Microsoft Security, Microsoft Help and Microsoft Works.
From: Gordon Darling on 19 Jun 2010 20:11 On Sun, 20 Jun 2010 00:08:19 +0000, Bear Bottoms wrote: > Gordon Darling <me(a)privacy.net> wrote in > news:4c1d53ab$0$3699$afc38c87(a)read01.usenet4all.se: > >> On Sat, 19 Jun 2010 18:25:00 +0000, Bear Bottoms wrote: >> >> <snip> >> >>> You guys always make a fuss. It was probably some harmless spyware. >> >> Wow! A whole new category of Bearware. When can we expect in-depth, >> "well researched" reviews of the new freeware category of "harmless >> spyware" >> > If I were you, I'd unplug your cat5 cause your too stoopid to know the > difference. Enlighten us. Define "harmless spyware". -- ox·y·mo·ron n. pl. ox·y·mo·ra or ox·y·mo·rons A rhetorical figure in which incongruous or contradictory terms are combined, as in Microsoft Security, Microsoft Help and Microsoft Works.
From: David H. Lipman on 19 Jun 2010 22:14 From: "Bear Bottoms" <bearbottoms1(a)gmai.com> | I think you know your context is way off. You and others jumped on Exe | File Information as having malware. It does not, so I think it is you and | them who can't distinguish between clean programs and malware. Does that | help put it in perspective for you? | You idiots can't even tell if a program has malware in it or not. Good | grief. Stop shooting yourself in the foot. It tested positive for malware and they reacted in the right way until it could be proven otherwise. You idiotic reply of "harmless malware" is both oxymoronic and and shortsighted. -- Dave http://www.claymania.com/removal-trojan-adware.html Multi-AV - http://www.pctipp.ch/downloads/dl/35905.asp
From: Nemesis on 20 Jun 2010 07:44 On Sun, 20 Jun 2010 01:15:46 +0000, Bear Bottoms wrote: > Gordon Darling <me(a)privacy.net> wrote in news:4c1d5cce$0$3696$afc38c87 > @read01.usenet4all.se: > >> On Sun, 20 Jun 2010 00:08:19 +0000, Bear Bottoms wrote: >> >>> Gordon Darling <me(a)privacy.net> wrote in >>> news:4c1d53ab$0$3699$afc38c87(a)read01.usenet4all.se: >>> >>>> On Sat, 19 Jun 2010 18:25:00 +0000, Bear Bottoms wrote: >>>> >>>> <snip> >>>> >>>>> You guys always make a fuss. It was probably some harmless spyware. OK, BB, I realize it must be an imposter. Even so .... >>>> Wow! A whole new category of Bearware. When can we expect in-depth, >>>> "well researched" reviews of the new freeware category of "harmless >>>> spyware" >>>> >>> If I were you, I'd unplug your cat5 cause your too stoopid to know the >>> difference. >> >> Enlighten us. Define "harmless spyware". >> > I think you know your context is way off. You and others jumped on Exe > File Information as having malware. It does not, so I think it is you > and them who can't distinguish between clean programs and malware. Does > that help put it in perspective for you? > > You idiots can't even tell if a program has malware in it or not. Good > grief. File exefileinformation.exe received on 2010.06.20 11:33:27 (UTC) Result: 20/41 (48.79%) Nice score from virustotal. Even useless panda flags it as a possible trojan. It scored even higher than the autorun virus that put all the local town's PCs down. "I'ĺl just reinstall windows, I do it all the time"(BB) []'s
From: Martin Jay on 20 Jun 2010 08:00
On Sat, 19 Jun 2010 20:42:26 +0100, za kAT <zakAT(a)super-secret-IPaddress.invalid> wrote: >On Sat, 19 Jun 2010 18:33:13 +0000 (UTC), Bear Bottoms wrote: >>A scan was performed with Malwarebytes, A-Squared, CureIt!, MSE, and >>Rising PC Doctor...the program is clean. I've also installed it, and ran >>monitors for thre(*%*0(_))+-9=-9=-8790670680608708698064$^&*&**%)(^(^(*^ >>$&($&*^*()&_*+_(+&*^&()*&)^)*(^*(^ >Bottom, are you still there? No. He's busy reinstalling Windows after his system became infected with "harmless spyware." :) -- Martin Jay |