Experiment to prove Dirac's new-radioactivities additive-creation Chapt 5 #166; ATOM TOTALITY
in [Physics]
|
Prev: reorganization of chapters Chapt 1 #165; ATOM TOTALITY
Next: history of sciences and deciding-evidence Chapt 2 #167; ATOM TOTALITY
From: Archimedes Plutonium on 15 Jun 2010 14:30 Experiment: I believe the best setup is the very microscope, even though Dirac himself was pushing for a astronomical proof setup with using the Moon to Earth 2cm/year approach for additive creation. Dirac mentions work by Shapiro and Van Flandern on page 84 of his book "Directions in Physics". Trouble with an astronomy proof is that the motion of the Moon and planets is far to complicated and complex for such a tiny measurement. As I wrote earlier, a theory of science is only acceptable as true if the technology and engineering of deciding-experiments is available. I suspect the engineering and technology for making a Dirac new-radioactivities experiment is now available, but not when Dirac was alive. I think the key or crucial component is the scanning tunnel microscope, or the precision used in the neutrino flipping experiment of large underground vats of a solution to test for neutrinos. I believe we have the precision to test Dirac's new radioactivities by using the tunnelling microscope to actually count the atoms. So if we counted out 100 atoms which we plan to watch over a extended period of time, and for which we expect newer atoms to appear within that isolated container of 100 original starting atoms or which we expect a higher atomic number atom to have grown from one of the 100 starting original atoms. Most people will balk because they realize this is breaking of the conservation laws since we have more than what we started with. But that is a fact of an Atom Totality. Archimedes Plutonium http://www.iw.net/~a_plutonium/ whole entire Universe is just one big atom where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies |