Prev: Algebra Question
Next: history of sciences and deciding-evidence Chapt 2 #167; ATOM TOTALITY
From: Archimedes Plutonium on 15 Jun 2010 14:30
Experiment: I believe the best setup is the very microscope, even
though Dirac himself
was pushing for a astronomical proof setup with using the Moon to
Earth 2cm/year
approach for additive creation. Dirac mentions work by Shapiro and Van
Flandern on
page 84 of his book "Directions in Physics".

Trouble with an astronomy proof is that the motion of the Moon and
planets is far to
complicated and complex for such a tiny measurement.

As I wrote earlier, a theory of science is only acceptable as true if
the technology and
engineering of deciding-experiments is available. I suspect the
engineering and technology
for making a Dirac new-radioactivities experiment is now available,
but not when
Dirac was alive. I think the key or crucial component is the scanning
tunnel microscope,
or the precision used in the neutrino flipping experiment of large
underground vats of
a solution to test for neutrinos.

I believe we have the precision to test Dirac's new radioactivities by
using the tunnelling
microscope to actually count the atoms. So if we counted out 100 atoms
which we
plan to watch over a extended period of time, and for which we expect
newer atoms to
appear within that isolated container of 100 original starting atoms
or which we expect
a higher atomic number atom to have grown from one of the 100 starting
original atoms.

Most people will balk because they realize this is breaking of the
conservation laws
since we have more than what we started with. But that is a fact of an
Atom Totality.

Archimedes Plutonium
http://www.iw.net/~a_plutonium/
whole entire Universe is just one big atom
where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies
 | 
Pages: 1
Prev: Algebra Question
Next: history of sciences and deciding-evidence Chapt 2 #167; ATOM TOTALITY