Explaining the nonsense of relativity to 10+ kids
in [Relativity]
|
From: Inertial on 9 Mar 2010 05:50 "Romanise" <joshidm(a)gmail.com> wrote in message news:244669c4-6714-47b7-b702-f67006dacf97(a)q21g2000yqm.googlegroups.com... > On Mar 9, 8:44 am, Arindam Banerjee <adda1...(a)bigpond.com> wrote: >> On Mar 9, 5:50 pm, Romanise <josh...(a)gmail.com> wrote: >> >> > On Mar 5, 2:23 pm, Zinnic <zeenr...(a)gate.net> wrote: >> >> > > I would appreciate it if you would give an example of your best >> > > evidence (other than the coincidence of the null results obtained by >> > > Einstein's or your theory of light) in support of your theory and >> > > against Einstein's Special Relativity theory. >> > > Regards >> > > Zinnic >> >> > I hope you got from the Greatest Genius on Earth >> >> of all time, may I beg to insert > > Has Zinnic affirmed that, in a private email to you? Arindam is hilarious .. a coward and liar, but hillarious nonetheless.
From: Day Brown on 12 Mar 2010 22:18 Zinnic wrote: > Thus my question remains, why is the reflected light NOT affected by > the speed of the mirrors? I need for you to explain how your theory > accomodates this apparent difference in the physics of emitted and > reflected (absorbed and instantaneously emitted?) light. Because it is a 'projected matrix' the software knows where the light is going. The speed is fixed because that is the frame rate of the projection.
From: Arindam Banerjee on 14 Mar 2010 20:24
On Mar 13, 2:18 pm, Day Brown <dayhbr...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > Zinnic wrote: > > Thus my question remains, why is the reflected light NOT affected by > > the speed of the mirrors? I need for you to explain how your theory > > accomodates this apparent difference in the physics of emitted and > > reflected (absorbed and instantaneously emitted?) light. I have explained this in an earlier post in this thread. > Because it is a 'projected matrix' the software knows where the light is > going. The speed is fixed because that is the frame rate of the projection. And that explanation had nothing to do with such mumbo-jumbo as above. Cheers, Arindam Banerjee |