From: Clint Sharp on
In message <hfvtt5$sjm$1(a)reversiblemaps.ath.cx>, Jasen Betts
<jasen(a)xnet.co.nz> writes
>stochiometry is not critical for explosions. it's more the partial
>pressure of the explosive fuel and the partial pressure of the oxidiser need
>to be above some limit.
Ahh, OK. I googled 'partial pressure' because I didn't recognise the
term. If you're testing for a specific gas or set of gases then the
concentrations can be predicted from the differential pressures though?
If that's the case then the catalyst/fuel cell method would still work
wouldn't it? (Not being obtuse, just trying to work something through
for my own curiosity now)
--
Clint Sharp
From: Jasen Betts on
On 2009-12-12, Clint Sharp <clint(a)clintsmc.demon.co.uk> wrote:
> In message <hfvtt5$sjm$1(a)reversiblemaps.ath.cx>, Jasen Betts
><jasen(a)xnet.co.nz> writes
>>stochiometry is not critical for explosions. it's more the partial
>>pressure of the explosive fuel and the partial pressure of the oxidiser need
>>to be above some limit.
> Ahh, OK. I googled 'partial pressure' because I didn't recognise the
> term. If you're testing for a specific gas or set of gases then the
> concentrations can be predicted from the differential pressures though?
> If that's the case then the catalyst/fuel cell method would still work
> wouldn't it? (Not being obtuse, just trying to work something through
> for my own curiosity now)

in gasses partial pressure the equivalent of what concentration is in
liquids.