From: za kAT on
On Sat, 16 Jan 2010 23:21:01 -0000, hummingbird wrote:

> Stubby has been intercepting the Internet.

It's a fair cop, but society is to blame.

--
za kAT
From: za kAT on
On Sun, 17 Jan 2010 00:42:06 +0000, hummingbird wrote:

> 'za kAT' wrote thus:
>
>>On Sat, 16 Jan 2010 23:21:01 -0000, hummingbird wrote:
>>
>>> Stubby has been intercepting the Internet.
>>
>>It's a fair cop, but society is to blame.
>
>
> A criminal who returns to the scene of the crime!

wrong
--
za kAT
From: Franklin on
hummingbird wrote:

> 'za kAT' wrote thus:
>
>>On Sat, 16 Jan 2010 23:21:01 -0000, hummingbird wrote:
>>
>>> Stubby has been intercepting the Internet.
>>
>>It's a fair cop, but society is to blame.
>
> A criminal who returns to the scene of the crime!
>

You used exactly that same phrase to make it look as if Ron May was
actually responsible for your own sock, Mystic Meg. Aioe's unique user ID
showed it was you who had made the post you are blaming everyone else for.
You wrote:


"Robb, you'll need to ask Ron May, since he posted
the original I believe, and then immediately responded
to it with a change of Subject: to divert attention away
from his guilt. He's cunning like that.

The other possibilities are Franklin and iNcReDuLoUs.

They all do these things regularly but give themselves
away. 'Criminals returning to the scene of the crime',
as they say. They can't resist it."


The details are explained here:
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.comp.freeware/msg/a0b1a6c57f292150
From: za kAT on
On Sun, 17 Jan 2010 00:49:17 GMT, Franklin wrote:

> hummingbird wrote:
>
>> 'za kAT' wrote thus:
>>
>>>On Sat, 16 Jan 2010 23:21:01 -0000, hummingbird wrote:
>>>
>>>> Stubby has been intercepting the Internet.
>>>
>>>It's a fair cop, but society is to blame.
>>
>> A criminal who returns to the scene of the crime!
>>
>
> You used exactly that same phrase to make it look as if Ron May was
> actually responsible for your own sock, Mystic Meg. Aioe's unique user ID
> showed it was you who had made the post you are blaming everyone else for.
> You wrote:
>
>
> "Robb, you'll need to ask Ron May, since he posted
> the original I believe, and then immediately responded
> to it with a change of Subject: to divert attention away
> from his guilt. He's cunning like that.
>
> The other possibilities are Franklin and iNcReDuLoUs.
>
> They all do these things regularly but give themselves
> away. 'Criminals returning to the scene of the crime',
> as they say. They can't resist it."
>
>
> The details are explained here:
> http://groups.google.com/group/alt.comp.freeware/msg/a0b1a6c57f292150

<sigh> It's all there in the archives.

--
za kAT
From: za kAT on
On Sun, 17 Jan 2010 01:34:33 +0000, hummingbird wrote:

> 'za kAT' wrote thus:
>
>>On Sun, 17 Jan 2010 00:42:06 +0000, hummingbird wrote:
>
>>> A criminal who returns to the scene of the crime!
>>
>>wrong
>
>
> Nah! It happens all the time, Stubby.

Glad you have finally realised it.

--
za kAT