From: GangGreene on 21 Dec 2009 20:19 Stefan Patric wrote: [putolin] >> >> Use gparted to reformat it to EXT3. There is no reason to ever use >> FAT16, if it's important to you to be able to plug it into a Windows box >> then format it to FAT32, but EXT3 is a much better file system. Linux >> will mount the stick with just about any file system but there is no >> reason to use an inefficient one if you don't have to. > > Also, you won't need journaling. So, don't use the -j option when > formatting the USB stick to ext3. > > That would be formatting the stick to ext2... not ext3
From: John Thompson on 21 Dec 2009 22:15 On 2009-12-21, Lew Pitcher <lpitcher(a)teksavvy.com> wrote: > On December 20, 2009 16:14, in comp.os.linux.hardware, slack(a)rcn.com wrote: > >> I want to backup /home on my Slackware Linux 12.2 installation before >> upgrading. >> >> I have a Dane Elec 2GB USB stick for the back up. >> >> $fdisk sda >> >> displays >> >> ID: 6 >> System: FAT16 >> >> for this stick. >> >> Do I need to create a Linux partition (ID: 83) before I can use the >> stick to backup /home? > > No, but you /can/. > > First and foremost, you need a filesystem that supports Unix file attributes > (UID, GID, permission bits, etc.). You can either > - format the USB stick with a UNIXish filesystem (ext2, minix, ...) or > - format a loopback file on the FAT16 fs with a unixish filesystem > Make this choice first. Sounds like a lot of bother. Since the OP is using this for backup, what's wrong with simply packing the files, *nix attributes and all, into a tarball, cpio, whatever archive and simply storing that on the vfat filesystem? -- -John (john(a)os2.dhs.org)
From: Stefan Patric on 22 Dec 2009 02:00 On Mon, 21 Dec 2009 20:19:02 -0500, GangGreene wrote: > Stefan Patric wrote: > > [putolin] > > >>> Use gparted to reformat it to EXT3. There is no reason to ever use >>> FAT16, if it's important to you to be able to plug it into a Windows >>> box then format it to FAT32, but EXT3 is a much better file system. >>> Linux will mount the stick with just about any file system but there >>> is no reason to use an inefficient one if you don't have to. >> >> Also, you won't need journaling. So, don't use the -j option when >> formatting the USB stick to ext3. >> >> >> > That would be formatting the stick to ext2... not ext3 Essentially, yes. But to avoid confusion, I worded it the way I did. Also, there are distinct, but minor differences, between the two. Ext3 is not just ext2 with a journal. Here's a quick overview of several Linux filesystems, including ext2 & 3: http://colbyframeco.com/~maco/nix/fs.pdf Stef
From: notbob on 22 Dec 2009 09:42 On 2009-12-22, Stefan Patric <not(a)thisaddress.com> wrote: > is not just ext2 with a journal. I have ext2 and ext3 and vfat files on the same vfat flash drive. I can't say about archiving. Otherwise, works fine. Provide umask access for reg users when mounting drive and they too can copy from key. nb
From: Joe Beanfish on 22 Dec 2009 14:18 GangGreene wrote: > Stefan Patric wrote: > > [putolin] > >>> Use gparted to reformat it to EXT3. There is no reason to ever use >>> FAT16, if it's important to you to be able to plug it into a Windows box >>> then format it to FAT32, but EXT3 is a much better file system. Linux >>> will mount the stick with just about any file system but there is no >>> reason to use an inefficient one if you don't have to. >> Also, you won't need journaling. So, don't use the -j option when >> formatting the USB stick to ext3. >> >> > > That would be formatting the stick to ext2... not ext3 Actually a usb stick might be one of the smarter places to use a journal since it may be yanked out at any time, possibly without unmounting. The journal will reduce the chances of corruption and loss. Not that I'm in any way suggesting that removal with unmounting is ok.
First
|
Prev
|
Next
|
Last
Pages: 1 2 3 4 Prev: Too many dropped frames and TxPause frames Next: problems mounting external USB HD |