From: GangGreene on
Stefan Patric wrote:

[putolin]

>>
>> Use gparted to reformat it to EXT3. There is no reason to ever use
>> FAT16, if it's important to you to be able to plug it into a Windows box
>> then format it to FAT32, but EXT3 is a much better file system. Linux
>> will mount the stick with just about any file system but there is no
>> reason to use an inefficient one if you don't have to.
>
> Also, you won't need journaling. So, don't use the -j option when
> formatting the USB stick to ext3.
>
>

That would be formatting the stick to ext2... not ext3


From: John Thompson on
On 2009-12-21, Lew Pitcher <lpitcher(a)teksavvy.com> wrote:

> On December 20, 2009 16:14, in comp.os.linux.hardware, slack(a)rcn.com wrote:
>
>> I want to backup /home on my Slackware Linux 12.2 installation before
>> upgrading.
>>
>> I have a Dane Elec 2GB USB stick for the back up.
>>
>> $fdisk sda
>>
>> displays
>>
>> ID: 6
>> System: FAT16
>>
>> for this stick.
>>
>> Do I need to create a Linux partition (ID: 83) before I can use the
>> stick to backup /home?
>
> No, but you /can/.
>
> First and foremost, you need a filesystem that supports Unix file attributes
> (UID, GID, permission bits, etc.). You can either
> - format the USB stick with a UNIXish filesystem (ext2, minix, ...) or
> - format a loopback file on the FAT16 fs with a unixish filesystem
> Make this choice first.

Sounds like a lot of bother. Since the OP is using this for backup,
what's wrong with simply packing the files, *nix attributes and all,
into a tarball, cpio, whatever archive and simply storing that on the
vfat filesystem?

--

-John (john(a)os2.dhs.org)
From: Stefan Patric on
On Mon, 21 Dec 2009 20:19:02 -0500, GangGreene wrote:

> Stefan Patric wrote:
>
> [putolin]
>
>
>>> Use gparted to reformat it to EXT3. There is no reason to ever use
>>> FAT16, if it's important to you to be able to plug it into a Windows
>>> box then format it to FAT32, but EXT3 is a much better file system.
>>> Linux will mount the stick with just about any file system but there
>>> is no reason to use an inefficient one if you don't have to.
>>
>> Also, you won't need journaling. So, don't use the -j option when
>> formatting the USB stick to ext3.
>>
>>
>>
> That would be formatting the stick to ext2... not ext3

Essentially, yes. But to avoid confusion, I worded it the way I did.
Also, there are distinct, but minor differences, between the two. Ext3
is not just ext2 with a journal.

Here's a quick overview of several Linux filesystems, including ext2 & 3:

http://colbyframeco.com/~maco/nix/fs.pdf


Stef


From: notbob on
On 2009-12-22, Stefan Patric <not(a)thisaddress.com> wrote:

> is not just ext2 with a journal.

I have ext2 and ext3 and vfat files on the same vfat flash drive. I can't
say about archiving. Otherwise, works fine. Provide umask access for
reg users when mounting drive and they too can copy from key.

nb
From: Joe Beanfish on
GangGreene wrote:
> Stefan Patric wrote:
>
> [putolin]
>
>>> Use gparted to reformat it to EXT3. There is no reason to ever use
>>> FAT16, if it's important to you to be able to plug it into a Windows box
>>> then format it to FAT32, but EXT3 is a much better file system. Linux
>>> will mount the stick with just about any file system but there is no
>>> reason to use an inefficient one if you don't have to.
>> Also, you won't need journaling. So, don't use the -j option when
>> formatting the USB stick to ext3.
>>
>>
>
> That would be formatting the stick to ext2... not ext3

Actually a usb stick might be one of the smarter places to use
a journal since it may be yanked out at any time, possibly without
unmounting. The journal will reduce the chances of corruption and loss.
Not that I'm in any way suggesting that removal with unmounting is ok.