Prev: Magnetism\Gravity
Next: The North American Nanohertz Observatory for Gravitational Waves
From: bert on 6 Jan 2010 17:16
On Jan 6, 5:00 am, Phil Bouchard <p...(a)fornux.com> wrote:
> It turns out by using the exact mathematical formulation of FR on the
> bending of light, we find the exact same angle that was observed in the
> 1919 Eddington eclipse experiment or 1.75 arc-sec.
>
> Furthermore in the latest paper that can be found at the following link
>   FR also represents low surface brightness galaxy rotation curves,
> which basically comes down to a different scaling factor:http://www.fornux.com/personal/philippe/fr/fr-sci_physics.pdf
>
> Once again the simulator previously used to approximate the calculations
> can be found here:http://www.fornux.com/personal/philippe/fr/fr.exe
>
> And AVI versions of the aforementioned simulator here:http://www.fornux.com/personal/philippe/fr/fr-lb.avihttp://www.fornux.com/personal/philippe/fr/fr-pp.avi
>
> The bending of light calculations are available upon request and I would
> like being aware of available mentorship in the subject or any updates.
>   Everything has been proven and there can be no reason not to, if not
> to spend another year of nothingness or political indoctrination.  All
> the necessary mathematical calculations are done, can be easily used and
> are ready for a presentation.
>
> Thank you,
> -Phil

To Ya All Light goes with the gravity curving of space.It can curve
concave and convex. So you see how easy it was for me to come up with
my "Concave & Covex theory"Its Nobel thinking Oi ya Bert
From: Sam Wormley on 6 Jan 2010 17:50
On 1/6/10 4:16 PM, bert wrote:

> To Ya All Light goes with the gravity curving of space.It can curve
> concave and convex. So you see how easy it was for me to come up with
> my "Concave& Covex theory"Its Nobel thinking Oi ya Bert

I was beginning to think you were dead, Herb.
From: eric gisse on 6 Jan 2010 18:10
Phil Bouchard wrote:

> eric gisse wrote:
>>
>> Let's see the calculations, Phil.
>>
>> It only took you the better part of what, two years?
>
> Exactly one year in my spare time.
>
> I am willing paying anybody reviewing it and helping me submitting it
> hopefully this month. It should be fairly easy since all the required
> calculations including the bending of light are done.

Shoot me an email and we'll discuss it. I might as well get paid for my
time.
From: Phil Bouchard on 6 Jan 2010 18:51
eric gisse wrote:
>
> Shoot me an email and we'll discuss it. I might as well get paid for my
> time.

Send me proof of a PhD.
From: eric gisse on 6 Jan 2010 21:41
Phil Bouchard wrote:

> eric gisse wrote:
>>
>> Shoot me an email and we'll discuss it. I might as well get paid for my
>> time.
>
> Send me proof of a PhD.

I don't have one. Not that the consideration is relevant because you won't
listen to Paul either.

Why don't you post your calculations and we'll have a go anyway just for
giggles?
First  |  Prev  | 
Pages: 1 2 3
Prev: Magnetism\Gravity
Next: The North American Nanohertz Observatory for Gravitational Waves