From: Phil Bouchard on 21 Jan 2010 13:45 By using the exact mathematical formulation of FR on the bending of light, we find the same angle that was observed in the 1919 Eddington eclipse experiment or 1.75 ". The mathematical proof is shown in the following book: https://www.createspace.com/3370163 Furthermore in the latest paper that can be found at the following link FR also represents low surface brightness galaxy rotation curves, which basically comes down to a different scaling factor: http://www.fornux.com/personal/philippe/fr/fr-sci_physics.pdf Once again the simulator previously used to approximate the calculations can be found here: http://www.fornux.com/personal/philippe/fr/fr.exe And AVI versions of the aforementioned simulator here: http://www.fornux.com/personal/philippe/fr/fr-lb.avi http://www.fornux.com/personal/philippe/fr/fr-pp.avi -Phil
From: eric gisse on 21 Jan 2010 14:12 Phil Bouchard wrote: > By using the exact mathematical formulation of FR on the bending of > light, we find the same angle that was observed in the 1919 Eddington > eclipse experiment or 1.75 ". The mathematical proof is shown in the > following book: > https://www.createspace.com/3370163 No, Phil, nobody is going to buy your book to see how you do something incorrectly. [snip rest]
From: Phil Bouchard on 21 Jan 2010 14:22 eric gisse wrote: > > No, Phil, nobody is going to buy your book to see how you do something > incorrectly. You'd be better off starting learning from it, son. Blunders and false hopes can only lead you to oblivion.
From: Androcles on 21 Jan 2010 14:32 "Phil Bouchard" <phil(a)fornux.com> wrote in message news:4b58a0e9$1(a)news.x-privat.org... > By using the exact mathematical formulation of FR on the bending of light, > we find the same angle that was observed in the 1919 Eddington eclipse > experiment or 1.75 ". The mathematical proof I can bend light MUCH more than that! http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/geoopt/optpic/brokpen.jpg
From: eric gisse on 21 Jan 2010 14:41
Phil Bouchard wrote: > eric gisse wrote: >> >> No, Phil, nobody is going to buy your book to see how you do something >> incorrectly. > > You'd be better off starting learning from it, son. Blunders and false > hopes can only lead you to oblivion. So Phil, how many copies of your book have you sold to people that are not related to you? |