Prev: Another "Lunar" meteorite contains muscle fiber remains
Next: Proton Radius Cannot Be Derived From Standard Model
From: josephus on 5 May 2010 12:38
nomen wrote:
> Benj<bjacoby(a)iwaynet.net> wrote:
>> On Apr 1, 11:29=A0am, "Eric Gisin"<er...(a)nospammail.net> wrote:
>>
>>> =A0" In the aftermath of Climategate a lot of scientists working on
>>> globa=
>> l warming-related topics are
>>> upset that their field has apparently lost credibility with the public.
>>> *=
>> The public seems to
>>> believe that climatology is beset with cliquish gatekeeping,
>>> wagon-circli=
>> ng, biased peer-review,
>>> faulty data and statistical incompetence. In response to these
>>> perception=
>> s, some scientists are
>>> casting around, in op-eds and weblogs, for ideas on how to hit back at
>>> th=
>> eir critics."
>>
>> Critics? Nah. Establishment science doesn't use that word. We call
>> them "deniers"! You know like the NeoNazis who say that Hitler's death
>> camps were all just vacation spas with swimming pools and concerts and
>> a good time had by all. That's what "deniers" are! Of course the
>> proven lies in IPCC reports which oddly persist even when they were
>> pointed out (like say the statement that 55% of the Netherlands is
>> below sea level and soon to be covered by rising seas due to AGW.
>> IPCC folks just ignored the Dutch scientists who tried to tell them
>> the correct figure is 26%). The mistake was published anyway. Just as
>> the IPCC ignored the fact that a paper in Nature predicting a 32 inch
>> sea rise was withdrawn with authors saying that they could no longer
>> draw firm conclusions about sea level rise. From the IPCC nothing but
>> repeated errors defended by a claim that they are supported by a
>> "consensus" of all really smart scientists. Yep all the claimed 2500
>> of them! Hey, it's democracy in action. It's science by popular vote.
>> who could "deny" the validity of that? If you have any doubts just
>> tune in the BBC or check with the Obama administration. They'll set
>> you straight.
>
> Global warming is a bunch of BULLSHIT! The global temperatures can vary
> between years or decades. If they think the world will warm ten degrees
> Fahrenheit by 2200 AD, they are obviously paranoid alarmist nutjobs. These
> nutjobs think recent cold snaps are related to global warming. That is just
> another alarmist ploy from the global warming nuts.

typical denier scee. they hate science and dislike scientists. the
fact is that science does not like liars. means deniers are really
stupid street people with pimples and acne. especially name calling is
a clue how clueless a denier can be. and they can all be seen by the
lies they tell.

josephus
--
I go sailing in the summer
and look at stars in the winter
Its not what you know that gets you in trouble
Its what you know that aint so. -- Josh Billings
 | 
Pages: 1
Prev: Another "Lunar" meteorite contains muscle fiber remains
Next: Proton Radius Cannot Be Derived From Standard Model