Fast Lorentz transforms: was Why is the square of the universal speed limit the amount of energy?
in [Physics]
|
Prev: Postscript: chapter 3 of Redshift Experiment became hugely more complex and complicated #52; ATOM TOTALITY
Next: V Maius MMX - Viva La Raza!
From: Androcles on 2 May 2010 12:00 "Tom Roberts" <tjroberts137(a)sbcglobal.net> wrote in message news:7eKdnWuvxZpxAUDWRVn_vwA(a)giganews.com... > BURT wrote: >> E = MC Squared >> Why is mass related by the square of light speed? > > [Your "C" is normally notated in lower case, which I'll use.] > > You got it wrong. In that equation c is not really the speed of light -- > calling it that is merely an accidental historical curiosity (see below). > > In that equation, c is actually the invariant speed of the Lorentz > transform, Bwahahahahahahahahahahahaha! We've heard of fast Fourier transforms, now we have even faster Lorentz transforms. Did anyone see that Lorentz transform going past Roberts's neuron like a bat out of hell? |