Prev: Fedora 12 wont run
Next: Paid Red Hat Linux
From: Tolik Piskov on 1 Dec 2009 01:35
Any suggestions?

Kernel 2.6.30.9-96.fc11.i686.PAE

Call Trace:
[<c0738681>] ? printk+0x14/0x1b
[<c07385cb>] panic+0x3e/0xe0
[<c073b23f>] oops_end+0x92/0xa1
[<c04218b4>] no_context+0x141/0x14b
[<c04219dd>] __bad_area_nosemaphore+0x11f/0x127
[<c0575f5f>] ? vsnprintf+0x208/0x245
[<c0575f5f>] ? vsnprintf+0x208/0x245
[<c0757dd6>] ? vsnprintf+0x7f/0x245
[<c044ca9e>] ? clocksource_read+0xe/0x11
[<c04219f7>] bad_area_nosemaphore+0x12/0x15
[<c073c1b6>] do_page_fault+0x102/0x215
[<c073c0b4>] ? do_page_fault+0x0/0x215
[<c073a8bd>] error_code+0x6d/0x74
[<c073c0b4>] ? do_page_fault+0x0/0x215
[<c0439ea6>] do_softirq+0x36/0x41
[<c043a047>] irq_exit+0x2e/0x5c
[<c0418b61>] smp_apic_timer_interrupt+0x6d/0x7b
[<c0408dc6>] apic_timer_interrupt+0x2a/0x30
[<c0420114>] ? native_safe_halt+0xa/0xc
[<c040e0c5>] default_idle+0x45/0x6d
[<c040771f>] cpu_idle+4e/0x67
[<c073592d>] start_secondary+0x1f5/0x233
From: Allen Kistler on 1 Dec 2009 03:10
Tolik Piskov wrote:
> Any suggestions?
>
> Kernel 2.6.30.9-96.fc11.i686.PAE
>
> Call Trace:
> [<c0738681>] ? printk+0x14/0x1b
> [<c07385cb>] panic+0x3e/0xe0
> [<c073b23f>] oops_end+0x92/0xa1
> [<c04218b4>] no_context+0x141/0x14b
> [<c04219dd>] __bad_area_nosemaphore+0x11f/0x127
> [<c0575f5f>] ? vsnprintf+0x208/0x245
> [<c0575f5f>] ? vsnprintf+0x208/0x245
> [<c0757dd6>] ? vsnprintf+0x7f/0x245
> [<c044ca9e>] ? clocksource_read+0xe/0x11
> [<c04219f7>] bad_area_nosemaphore+0x12/0x15
> [<c073c1b6>] do_page_fault+0x102/0x215
> [<c073c0b4>] ? do_page_fault+0x0/0x215
> [<c073a8bd>] error_code+0x6d/0x74
> [<c073c0b4>] ? do_page_fault+0x0/0x215
> [<c0439ea6>] do_softirq+0x36/0x41
> [<c043a047>] irq_exit+0x2e/0x5c
> [<c0418b61>] smp_apic_timer_interrupt+0x6d/0x7b
> [<c0408dc6>] apic_timer_interrupt+0x2a/0x30
> [<c0420114>] ? native_safe_halt+0xa/0xc
> [<c040e0c5>] default_idle+0x45/0x6d
> [<c040771f>] cpu_idle+4e/0x67
> [<c073592d>] start_secondary+0x1f5/0x233

I can't say I recognize the trace.

Did older kernels work?
9-99 came out moments ago. Does that work?

If an older kernel works and 9-99 doesn't, then use the older kernel and
file a bug against 9-99.
From: despen on 1 Dec 2009 21:14
Tolik Piskov <tolik.piskov(a)gmail.com> writes:

> Any suggestions?
>
> Kernel 2.6.30.9-96.fc11.i686.PAE
>
> Call Trace:
> [<c0738681>] ? printk+0x14/0x1b
> [<c07385cb>] panic+0x3e/0xe0
> [<c073b23f>] oops_end+0x92/0xa1
> [<c04218b4>] no_context+0x141/0x14b
> [<c04219dd>] __bad_area_nosemaphore+0x11f/0x127
> [<c0575f5f>] ? vsnprintf+0x208/0x245
> [<c0575f5f>] ? vsnprintf+0x208/0x245
> [<c0757dd6>] ? vsnprintf+0x7f/0x245
> [<c044ca9e>] ? clocksource_read+0xe/0x11
> [<c04219f7>] bad_area_nosemaphore+0x12/0x15
> [<c073c1b6>] do_page_fault+0x102/0x215
> [<c073c0b4>] ? do_page_fault+0x0/0x215
> [<c073a8bd>] error_code+0x6d/0x74
> [<c073c0b4>] ? do_page_fault+0x0/0x215
> [<c0439ea6>] do_softirq+0x36/0x41
> [<c043a047>] irq_exit+0x2e/0x5c
> [<c0418b61>] smp_apic_timer_interrupt+0x6d/0x7b
> [<c0408dc6>] apic_timer_interrupt+0x2a/0x30
> [<c0420114>] ? native_safe_halt+0xa/0xc
> [<c040e0c5>] default_idle+0x45/0x6d
> [<c040771f>] cpu_idle+4e/0x67
> [<c073592d>] start_secondary+0x1f5/0x233

I don't know, but it looks like the last thing it did was a printk.
There should be something in a log somewhere.

Also I see something about apic in there. You might try adding
"noapic" to your boot options.
 | 
Pages: 1
Prev: Fedora 12 wont run
Next: Paid Red Hat Linux