From: Wes on 18 Mar 2010 15:12 Being very new to Access I am struggling a bit, so need some assistance. I have an ACCESS 2000 manual and keep trying to figure it out, but I am just a bit ACCESS deprived. I have a form that will be used for New Employees. When I OPEN the form, (OPEN event, I think,) I need to get to the last record in my table. I have tried DoCmd.GoToRecord acDataTable, "SalesAssociate", acLast but get an error saying the table is not open. I have tried several other things, but nothing seems to work. I know I have it wrong, but can't figure it out. Any suggestions Thanks Wes
From: Jeff Boyce on 18 Mar 2010 15:33 Wes Access tables store data rather like "buckets o' data". That is, there's no inherent (human-perceptible) order. Thus, the "Last" record only makes sense if YOU have imposed some sort order. What you YOU mean by "last"? Regards Jeff Boyce Microsoft Access MVP -- Disclaimer: This author may have received products and services mentioned in this post. Mention and/or description of a product or service herein does not constitute endorsement thereof. Any code or pseudocode included in this post is offered "as is", with no guarantee as to suitability. You can thank the FTC of the USA for making this disclaimer possible/necessary. "Wes" <wesjester(a)charter.net> wrote in message news:UWuon.3104$gF5.947(a)newsfe13.iad... > Being very new to Access I am struggling a bit, so need some assistance. I > have an ACCESS 2000 manual and keep trying to figure it out, but I am just > a bit ACCESS deprived. > > I have a form that will be used for New Employees. When I OPEN the form, > (OPEN event, I think,) I need to get to the last record in my table. I > have tried > > DoCmd.GoToRecord acDataTable, "SalesAssociate", acLast > > but get an error saying the table is not open. > > I have tried several other things, but nothing seems to work. > > I know I have it wrong, but can't figure it out. > > Any suggestions > > Thanks > > Wes
From: J_Goddard via AccessMonster.com on 18 Mar 2010 15:42 Hi - If you are using this in a form, try using DoCmd.GoToRecord ,,acLast. This will go to the last record in whatever dataset the form is using as its RecordSource, e.g. tblEmployee If you are using the form to add new data, use acNew instead of acLast. John Wes wrote: >Being very new to Access I am struggling a bit, so need some assistance. > I have an ACCESS 2000 manual and keep trying to figure it out, but I >am just a bit ACCESS deprived. > >I have a form that will be used for New Employees. When I OPEN the >form, (OPEN event, I think,) I need to get to the last record in my >table. I have tried > >DoCmd.GoToRecord acDataTable, "SalesAssociate", acLast > >but get an error saying the table is not open. > >I have tried several other things, but nothing seems to work. > >I know I have it wrong, but can't figure it out. > >Any suggestions > >Thanks > >Wes -- John Goddard Ottawa, ON Canada jrgoddard at cyberus dot ca Message posted via AccessMonster.com http://www.accessmonster.com/Uwe/Forums.aspx/access-gettingstarted/201003/1
From: Wes on 18 Mar 2010 15:49 On 3/18/2010 3:33 PM, Jeff Boyce wrote: > Wes > > Access tables store data rather like "buckets o' data". That is, there's no > inherent (human-perceptible) order. Thus, the "Last" record only makes > sense if YOU have imposed some sort order. > > What you YOU mean by "last"? > > Regards > > Jeff Boyce > Microsoft Access MVP > I need to ADD a new employee. In the Access manual, looking at the sequence of events, it indicates that using the OPEN event you can determine if this is a "new" reocrd. If so, you need to move to the end of the recordset. Otherwise you will continue to use the first record. Unfortunately, I am at a big disadvantage. I have several years of experience using the "big" relational databases, Oracle, Sybase, DB2, etc., and the programming is completely different. I am trying to learn to use ACCESS for a small business I am starting. At the moment it is challenging, but it looks like a really cool facility that has a lot of power. Oh, I do have some small amount of VBA experience, but that is from the EXCEL perspective. Thanks for the help Wes
From: Jeff Boyce on 18 Mar 2010 16:23
Since Access tables are buckets o' data, you do not need to go to the last record before adding a new one. Check Access HELP for "adding a new record". There's even a property in forms that lets them be used ONLY for entering new records. Again, Access keeps track of where it gets added, so you don't have to. Good luck! Regards Jeff Boyce Microsoft Access MVP -- Disclaimer: This author may have received products and services mentioned in this post. Mention and/or description of a product or service herein does not constitute endorsement thereof. Any code or pseudocode included in this post is offered "as is", with no guarantee as to suitability. You can thank the FTC of the USA for making this disclaimer possible/necessary. "Wes" <wesjester(a)charter.net> wrote in message news:Zsvon.75277$1n5.56529(a)newsfe04.iad... > On 3/18/2010 3:33 PM, Jeff Boyce wrote: >> Wes >> >> Access tables store data rather like "buckets o' data". That is, there's >> no >> inherent (human-perceptible) order. Thus, the "Last" record only makes >> sense if YOU have imposed some sort order. >> >> What you YOU mean by "last"? >> >> Regards >> >> Jeff Boyce >> Microsoft Access MVP >> > I need to ADD a new employee. In the Access manual, looking at the > sequence of events, it indicates that using the OPEN event you can > determine if this is a "new" reocrd. If so, you need to move to the end > of the recordset. Otherwise you will continue to use the first record. > > Unfortunately, I am at a big disadvantage. I have several years of > experience using the "big" relational databases, Oracle, Sybase, DB2, > etc., and the programming is completely different. I am trying to learn > to use ACCESS for a small business I am starting. At the moment it is > challenging, but it looks like a really cool facility that has a lot of > power. > > Oh, I do have some small amount of VBA experience, but that is from the > EXCEL perspective. > > Thanks for the help > > Wes |