Prev: xiangyanh5
Next: Linux 2.6.35
From: Keika Kobayashi on 1 Aug 2010 20:00
(2010/07/31 4:06), Davidlohr Bueso wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The length of the BLOCK_IPOLL string is making it's value be printed too
> far to the right. This patch fixes this and makes the output a bit
> neater.
>
> Currently:
> CPU0
> HI: 0
> TIMER: 599792
> NET_TX: 2
> NET_RX: 6
> BLOCK: 80807
> BLOCK_IOPOLL: 0
> TASKLET: 20012
> SCHED: 0
> HRTIMER: 63
> RCU: 619279
>
> With patch:
> CPU0
> HI: 0
> TIMER: 585582
> NET_TX: 2
> NET_RX: 6
> BLOCK: 80320
> BLOCK_IOPOLL: 0
> TASKLET: 19287
> SCHED: 0
> HRTIMER: 62
> RCU: 604441
>
>
>
> Thanks,
> Davidlohr
>
>
> Signed-off-by: Davidlohr Bueso <dave(a)gnu.org>
> ---
> fs/proc/softirqs.c | 4 ++--
> 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/proc/softirqs.c b/fs/proc/softirqs.c
> index 1807c24..3799473 100644
> --- a/fs/proc/softirqs.c
> +++ b/fs/proc/softirqs.c
> @@ -10,13 +10,13 @@ static int show_softirqs(struct seq_file *p, void *v)
> {
> int i, j;
>
> - seq_printf(p, " ");
> + seq_printf(p, " ");
> for_each_possible_cpu(i)
> seq_printf(p, "CPU%-8d", i);
> seq_printf(p, "\n");
>
> for (i = 0; i < NR_SOFTIRQS; i++) {
> - seq_printf(p, "%8s:", softirq_to_name[i]);
> + seq_printf(p, "%12s:", softirq_to_name[i]);
> for_each_possible_cpu(j)
> seq_printf(p, " %10u", kstat_softirqs_cpu(i, j));
> seq_printf(p, "\n");

Sorry for late response.

It looks good to me.

// Keika Kobayashi
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo(a)vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
From: Davidlohr Bueso on 6 Aug 2010 11:00
On Mon, 2010-08-02 at 08:51 +0900, Keika Kobayashi wrote:
> (2010/07/31 4:06), Davidlohr Bueso wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > The length of the BLOCK_IPOLL string is making it's value be printed too
> > far to the right. This patch fixes this and makes the output a bit
> > neater.
> >
> > Currently:
> > CPU0
> > HI: 0
> > TIMER: 599792
> > NET_TX: 2
> > NET_RX: 6
> > BLOCK: 80807
> > BLOCK_IOPOLL: 0
> > TASKLET: 20012
> > SCHED: 0
> > HRTIMER: 63
> > RCU: 619279
> >
> > With patch:
> > CPU0
> > HI: 0
> > TIMER: 585582
> > NET_TX: 2
> > NET_RX: 6
> > BLOCK: 80320
> > BLOCK_IOPOLL: 0
> > TASKLET: 19287
> > SCHED: 0
> > HRTIMER: 62
> > RCU: 604441
> >
> >
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Davidlohr
> >
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Davidlohr Bueso <dave(a)gnu.org>
> > ---
> > fs/proc/softirqs.c | 4 ++--
> > 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/fs/proc/softirqs.c b/fs/proc/softirqs.c
> > index 1807c24..3799473 100644
> > --- a/fs/proc/softirqs.c
> > +++ b/fs/proc/softirqs.c
> > @@ -10,13 +10,13 @@ static int show_softirqs(struct seq_file *p, void *v)
> > {
> > int i, j;
> >
> > - seq_printf(p, " ");
> > + seq_printf(p, " ");
> > for_each_possible_cpu(i)
> > seq_printf(p, "CPU%-8d", i);
> > seq_printf(p, "\n");
> >
> > for (i = 0; i < NR_SOFTIRQS; i++) {
> > - seq_printf(p, "%8s:", softirq_to_name[i]);
> > + seq_printf(p, "%12s:", softirq_to_name[i]);
> > for_each_possible_cpu(j)
> > seq_printf(p, " %10u", kstat_softirqs_cpu(i, j));
> > seq_printf(p, "\n");
>
> Sorry for late response.
>
> It looks good to me.
>
> // Keika Kobayashi

Then, if no one objects, can we get it added upstream?

Thanks,
Davidlohr

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo(a)vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
 | 
Pages: 1
Prev: xiangyanh5
Next: Linux 2.6.35