From: Steffen Klassert on 5 Jul 2010 10:00 On Mon, Jul 05, 2010 at 09:43:57PM +0800, Herbert Xu wrote: > On Mon, Jul 05, 2010 at 05:35:32PM +0400, Dan Kruchinin wrote: > > > > > Both cases should be handled in the same way. So we could just > > > stop the instance if the cpumasks do not intersect, and enable > > > it as soon as they do intersect again. The padata instance would > > > refuse to do anything as long as the cpumasks do not intersect, > > > but it is still in a consistent state. Let me add the infrastructure > > > to handle this, then you can use it with your patches. > > > > Ok, get it. > > So I should wait for another patch, right? > Right. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo(a)vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
First
|
Prev
|
Pages: 1 2 Prev: [PATCH 1/2] edac: mpc85xx: Fix MPC85xx dependency Next: Lieber Freund!!! |