From: Peter Olcott on

"David Schwartz" <davids(a)webmaster.com> wrote in message
news:1a5b8da0-de50-4e88-87ce-b0f1900d570b(a)u9g2000prm.googlegroups.com...
On Apr 21, 3:19 pm, "Peter Olcott" <NoS...(a)OCR4Screen.com>
wrote:

> I would not need a high end database that can run in
> distributed mode, I would only need a web application that
> can append a few bytes to a file with these bytes coming
> through HTTP.

--Yep. Just make sure your web server is designed not to
send an
--acknowledgment unless it is sure it has the transaction
information.
--And do not allow the computer providing the service to
continue until
--it has received and validated that acknowledgment.
--
--DS

Yes, those are the two most crucial keys.


From: Jasen Betts on
On 2010-04-21, Scott Lurndal <scott(a)slp53.sl.home> wrote:
> "Peter Olcott" <NoSpam(a)OCR4Screen.com> writes:
>>
>>"Ian Collins" <ian-news(a)hotmail.com> wrote in message
>>news:836u94Fvj5U5(a)mid.individual.net...
>>> On 04/21/10 06:06 AM, Peter Olcott wrote:
>>>>
>>>> SSD have a limited life that is generally not compatible
>>>> with extremely high numbers of transactions.
>>>>
>>> Not any more.
>>>
>>> They are used in the most transaction intensive (cache and
>>> logs) roles in many ZFS storage configurations. They are
>>> used where a very high number of IOPs are required.
>>>
>>> --
>>> Ian Collins
>>
>>100,000 writes per cell and the best ones are fried.
>> http://en.wikipedia.org:80/wiki/Solid-state_drive
>
> Wikipedia? How about calling up Intel and asking their opinion?

call them?

http://download.intel.com/pressroom/kits/vssdrives/Nand_PB.pdf

10^5 cycles: straight from the horses mouth.

you can probaby get more than 10^5 especially if you can quarrantine
the failing cells, but Intel only promises 10^5


--- news://freenews.netfront.net/ - complaints: news(a)netfront.net ---
From: Peter Olcott on

"Jasen Betts" <jasen(a)xnet.co.nz> wrote in message
news:hquct9$744$1(a)reversiblemaps.ath.cx...
> On 2010-04-21, Scott Lurndal <scott(a)slp53.sl.home> wrote:
>> "Peter Olcott" <NoSpam(a)OCR4Screen.com> writes:
>>>
>>>"Ian Collins" <ian-news(a)hotmail.com> wrote in message
>>>news:836u94Fvj5U5(a)mid.individual.net...
>>>> On 04/21/10 06:06 AM, Peter Olcott wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> SSD have a limited life that is generally not
>>>>> compatible
>>>>> with extremely high numbers of transactions.
>>>>>
>>>> Not any more.
>>>>
>>>> They are used in the most transaction intensive (cache
>>>> and
>>>> logs) roles in many ZFS storage configurations. They
>>>> are
>>>> used where a very high number of IOPs are required.
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Ian Collins
>>>
>>>100,000 writes per cell and the best ones are fried.
>>> http://en.wikipedia.org:80/wiki/Solid-state_drive
>>
>> Wikipedia? How about calling up Intel and asking their
>> opinion?
>
> call them?
>
> http://download.intel.com/pressroom/kits/vssdrives/Nand_PB.pdf
>
> 10^5 cycles: straight from the horses mouth.
>
> you can probaby get more than 10^5 especially if you can
> quarrantine
> the failing cells, but Intel only promises 10^5
>
>
> --- news://freenews.netfront.net/ - complaints:
> news(a)netfront.net ---

Intel makes both SLC and MLC, MLC has about a 100-fold
shorter life than SLC.