From: thanatoid on 8 Jan 2010 22:03 "Unknown" <unknown(a)unknown.kom> wrote in news:ugjbRCKkKHA.2184(a)TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl: > Absolutely, positively correct. The only worse thing is > the complaining about it. You and all the others incapable of comprehending the reasons for top-posting being bad and for the need for snipping are fucked in the head. I am ASTOUNDED at the level of stupidity in the XP groups compared to the pre-XP groups. And /they're/ not full of geniuses, not by a long shot. <SNIP>
From: thanatoid on 9 Jan 2010 17:08 John John - MVP <audetweld(a)nbnot.nb.ca> wrote in news:emYDdmSkKHA.3476(a)TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl: <SNIP> > The intelligence quotient of the group will increase by a > thousand fold as soon as you leave. I love a good laugh, thanks, oh-so-valuable one.
From: Stan Brown on 10 Jan 2010 09:33 Fri, 8 Jan 2010 09:31:36 -0800 from "Don Schmidt" <"Don Schmidt">: > > If top posting is so bad, why does the cursor default to the top when > creating a response? Because you're using a bad newsreader. Microsoft has made a career of subverting Internet standards -- look at the sequence of Internet Explorers for more evidence. -- Stan Brown, Oak Road Systems, Tompkins County, New York, USA http://OakRoadSystems.com Shikata ga nai...
From: "Don Schmidt" Don on 10 Jan 2010 11:45 It is better to put the most recent correspondence on the top, reverse chronological filing. Why many think scrolling to the bottom of each message makes sense, doesn't for me. If one is exchanging letters with others would you put the most recent letter on the top, or bottom of the pile? If you select the bottom, every time you made reference to it you would need to pick up the pile and pull the bottom letter; in a business environment, chaos. Take care, -- Don - Vancouver, USA "May your shadow be found in happy places." - Native North American "Stan Brown" <the_stan_brown(a)fastmail.fm> wrote in message news:MPG.25b3af62423a1a0698be5f(a)news.individual.net... > Fri, 8 Jan 2010 09:31:36 -0800 from "Don Schmidt" <"Don Schmidt">: >> >> If top posting is so bad, why does the cursor default to the top when >> creating a response? > > Because you're using a bad newsreader. Microsoft has made a career > of subverting Internet standards -- look at the sequence of Internet > Explorers for more evidence. > > -- > Stan Brown, Oak Road Systems, Tompkins County, New York, USA > http://OakRoadSystems.com > Shikata ga nai...
From: thanatoid on 10 Jan 2010 11:58 "Don Schmidt" <Don Engineer(a)PNB.Retired_1987> wrote in news:0r6dnbfsa7aBmdfWnZ2dnUVZ_qOdnZ2d(a)posted.palinacquisition: > It is better to put the most recent correspondence on the > top, reverse chronological filing. Why many think > scrolling to the bottom of each message makes sense, > doesn't for me. If one is exchanging letters with others > would you put the most recent letter on the top, or bottom > of the pile? If you select the bottom, every time you made > reference to it you would need to pick up the pile and pull > the bottom letter; in a business environment, chaos. If you have perfect memory and never get confused by anything and remember EVERYTHING everybody says, and recall references to links made 20 posts earlier by someone who only posted once ever so s/he is not a friend of yours, then fine. But I don't know many people like that. One of the things that made text Usenet great (when it /was/ great instead of crippled and slowly being killed off) was that you could engage in interesting (or stupid) threads, and it is much easier to keep LOGIC /logical/ when it is in FORWARD chronological order. Also, you don't leave posts in their entirety. You reply to what you feel needs a comment, right below, and you <SNIP> what is not relevant or IYO unnecessary for further discussion.
First
|
Prev
|
Next
|
Last
Pages: 1 2 3 4 Prev: Right click dropdown list in windows explorer? Next: Registry cleaner ? |