For the person who has everything, a bottle to keep it in.
in [Physics]
|
From: Otto Bahn on 12 Mar 2010 11:50 "R H Draney" <dadoctah(a)spamcop.net> wrote >>> Here are four more interesting questions: Given the stated premise that >>> Klein bottles "contain everything", for a bottle with a finite radius of >>> cross-section (say 1 metre), what is the mean density of its contents? >>> How big does such a Klein bottle need to be before its surface is >>> outside of its event horizon? What about outside of its Schwarzschild >>> radius? Would such a Klein bottle be considered rotating or >>> non-rotating? >>> >>Ordinary Klein bottles contain all of space. A sufficiently large >>_rotating_ Klein bottle would contain all of time. > > Perhaps one *does*...that would sort of close the book on cosmology, > wouldn't > it?...r Ack! DO NOT REPEAT DO NOT close the book on cosmology. I'd rather die a slow heat death. --oTTo--
From: John Holmes on 12 Mar 2010 22:41 Otto Bahn wrote: > "Peter Moylan" <gro.nalyomp(a)retep> wrote [...] >> >> -- >> Peter Moylan, Newcastle, NSW, Australia. http://www.pmoylan.org >> For an e-mail address, see my web page. > > What's not safe for work about Newcastle?! Does Australia > have zero tolerance in the workplace? You've got the abbreviation wrong. It stands for Newcastle, Sydney, Wollongong. -- Regards John for mail: my initials plus a u e at tpg dot com dot au
From: Ostap S. B. M. Bender Jr. on 13 Mar 2010 02:03 On Mar 10, 12:22 am, R H Draney <dadoc...(a)spamcop.net> wrote: > David DeLaney filted: > > > > >Jonathan de Boyne Pollard <J.deBoynePollard-newsgro...(a)NTLWorld.COM> wrote: > >>> They are empty, they contain everything, including themselves and any > >>> scale you use to weight them, so they cannot have weight. > > >>So here's an interesting question, then: What's the acceleration due to > >>gravity at the surface of a Klein bottle? > > >It's a trick question, because Klein bottles do not suck. > > Maybe you should check that statement with *Mrs* Klein....r > Who said that Klein is a male?
From: Mark Edwards on 13 Mar 2010 07:04 David DeLaney filted: >>>Klein bottles do not suck. R H Draney <dadoc...(a)spamcop.net> wrote: >> Maybe you should check that statement with *Mrs* Klein.... No cluons were harmed when Ostap S. B. M. Bender Jr. wrote: >Who said that Klein is a male? For THAT matter, who said "Mrs Klein" is a female? Mark Edwards -- Proof of Sanity Forged Upon Request
From: Dr. HotSalt on 13 Mar 2010 15:05
On Mar 13, 4:04 am, Mark Edwards <Mark-Edwa...(a)comcast.net> wrote: > David DeLaney filted: > > >>>Klein bottles do not suck. > > R H Draney <dadoc...(a)spamcop.net> wrote: > > >> Maybe you should check that statement with *Mrs* Klein.... > > No cluons were harmed when Ostap S. B. M. Bender Jr. wrote: > > >Who said that Klein is a male? > > For THAT matter, who said "Mrs Klein" is a female? You know, seen from the outside, one end of a Klein bottle is an "outie", and the other is an "innie". OTOH seen from the *inside*... NO CARRIER Dr. HotSalt |