From: Herzl Regev on 1 Apr 2010 10:43 When converting a FAT filesystem into NTFS, what are the pros and cons of using convert v. format, other than the backup issue? E.g. is there a danger to the integrity of the files under conversion?
From: Mark Adams on 1 Apr 2010 11:35 "Herzl Regev" wrote: > When converting a FAT filesystem into NTFS, what are the pros and cons of > using convert v. format, other than the backup issue? E.g. is there a danger > to the integrity of the files under conversion? Converting FAT to NTFS is supposed to leave files on the partition intact. As always, there might be some risk of data corruption or loss during the conversion. It would be wise to have a backup of those files. Formatting wipes everything out on the partition, so you most definitely need to have files backed up to a different location.
From: smlunatick on 1 Apr 2010 11:38 On Apr 1, 2:43 pm, Herzl Regev <HerzlRe...(a)discussions.microsoft.com> wrote: > When converting a FAT filesystem into NTFS, what are the pros and cons of > using convert v. format, other than the backup issue? E.g. is there a danger > to the integrity of the files under conversion? Integrity of files is always a concern. Convert usually works well and would normally keep the files intact Format would force you to "copy" the files off the drive to be converted and then to copy them back.
From: Ken Blake, MVP on 1 Apr 2010 11:57 On Thu, 1 Apr 2010 07:43:01 -0700, Herzl Regev <HerzlRegev(a)discussions.microsoft.com> wrote: > When converting a FAT filesystem into NTFS, what are the pros and cons of > using convert v. format, other than the backup issue? E.g. is there a danger > to the integrity of the files under conversion? There is no need to format. To convert to NTFS, you use the CONVERT command. But first read http://www.aumha.org/a/ntfscvt.htm because there's an important issue regarding cluster size that isn't obvious. Also note that conversion is a big step, affecting everything on your drive. When you take such a big step, no matter how unlikely, it is always possible that something could go wrong. For that reason, it's prudent to make sure you have a backup of anything you can't afford to lose before beginning. -- Ken Blake, Microsoft MVP (Windows Desktop Experience) since 2003 Please Reply to the Newsgroup
From: Anteaus on 1 Apr 2010 13:46 The main risk would be that of a power failure during the conversion. If these is any possibility of this then it might be worthwhile to beg or borrow a UPS. Otherwise, it's rare for the conversion to go wrong. "Herzl Regev" wrote: > When converting a FAT filesystem into NTFS, what are the pros and cons of > using convert v. format, other than the backup issue? E.g. is there a danger > to the integrity of the files under conversion?
|
Pages: 1 Prev: iis on xp does not start The server {A9E69610-B80D-11D0-B9B9-00A0C Next: Corrupt system file |