Four Natural Dimensions
in [Math]
|
Prev: In Euclid IP, you actually have to produce a new prime to be valid #645 Correcting Math
Next: When is the Math Forum of Drexel back up and running properly?
From: KBH on 10 Jul 2010 02:15 The KBH Word Coordinate Application assigns 17,636 most frequent words to the KBH Word Coordinate System. The KBH Word Coordinate System has a letter for column position, a letter for row position, a letter for page, and a letter for book. From this system I developed a viewpoint that there are only four natural dimensions. The first dimension is width, the second dimension is height, the third dimension is depth, and the fourth dimension is a coordinate system identification or coordinate system ID. Now Book A and Book B could both be on a table but it doesn't matter if they are five inches apart or three feet apart. Each separate coordinate system has ID but not location. The items in the coordinate systems have location but the coordinate systems themselves do not have location. And the coordinate system ID could be a dozen or more parameters but it is only one ID and the fourth dimension. Now someone might have a Book A in Building A and a Book A in Building B. But Book A in Building A can simply be Book AA while Book A in Building B can simply be Book AB. Any attempt to develop another dimension simply increases the count in the fourth dimension or adds detail to the coordinate system ID. Then Book A might be in the Library of Congress but it's possible to go to the Library of Congress without knowing where it is. Just call a travel agent and say "get me door-to-door to the Library of Congress". So there is interaction with coordinate systems even though they have only ID and not location. But time can make a fourth dimension. For instance with a view perspective of looking up at the stars, the coordinates of the stars depend on a time and that is a coordinate system ID.
From: KBH on 10 Jul 2010 02:48 On Jul 10, 2:15 am, KBH <emptyp...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > The KBH Word Coordinate Application assigns 17,636 most frequent words > to the KBH Word Coordinate System. > > The KBH Word Coordinate System has a letter for column position, a > letter for row position, a letter for page, and a letter for book. > > From this system I developed a viewpoint that there are only four > natural dimensions. The first dimension is width, the second dimension > is height, the third dimension is depth, and the fourth dimension is a > coordinate system identification or coordinate system ID. > > Now Book A and Book B could both be on a table but it doesn't matter > if they are five inches apart or three feet apart. Each separate > coordinate system has ID but not location. The items in the coordinate > systems have location but the coordinate systems themselves do not > have location. And the coordinate system ID could be a dozen or more > parameters but it is only one ID and the fourth dimension. > > Now someone might have a Book A in Building A and a Book A in Building > B. But Book A in Building A can simply be Book AA while Book A in > Building B can simply be Book AB. Any attempt to develop another > dimension simply increases the count in the fourth dimension or adds > detail to the coordinate system ID. > > Then Book A might be in the Library of Congress but it's possible to > go to the Library of Congress without knowing where it is. Just call a > travel agent and say "get me door-to-door to the Library of Congress". > So there is interaction with coordinate systems even though they have > only ID and not location. > > But time can make a fourth dimension. For instance with a view > perspective of looking up at the stars, the coordinates of the stars > depend on a time and that is a coordinate system ID. Well, a coordinate system physical location would be a parameter of a coordinate system ID. But this is a situation of comparing mapping to map reading. The physical location can be interacted with by map reading at any location.
From: spudnik on 11 Jul 2010 22:27 very funny, mister President -- and, I read a book like that! > > travel agent and say "get me door-to-door to the Library of Congress". thus&so: well, what did he do, when he got to n=67? (sumorial ?-) > Fermat proved all successes of the exponent 2 are non-successes for exp.4.. I would speculate that Fermat squared the square of the Pythagorean sides to get the fourth power he used in his proof, and that he used fractions in his own explorations. The ancients, I have read, used fractions. Number theory also simplifies overwhelming information. thus&so: so, how about for base-3? -- not "sumorial," if that's not a pun. > "Generalization to digits beyond the first". --les ducs d'oil! http://wlym.com
From: KBH on 17 Jul 2010 03:57
On Jul 11, 10:27 pm, spudnik <Space...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > very funny, mister President -- and, > I read a book like that! > I went ahead and wrote the book but it's a very small book: http://www.kbhscape.com/fourth.htm |