Prev: Sunbathing Photo
Next: Why P&S's should do some reading before taking the plunge with real cameras
From: Me on 1 Jun 2010 01:33 On 1/06/2010 4:48 p.m., John McWilliams wrote: > Me wrote: >> On 1/06/2010 12:48 p.m., Rich wrote: >>> >>> Yeah, I remember worthless, paper companies in the 1990's worth more in >>> the stock market than GE because had high-tech names and that impressed >>> morons. F--- Apple. >>> >> You can't seriously compare Apple, with revenue of ~$40 billion, >> income (EBIT) of $11 billion, and profit of ~$8 billion with >> tech-bubble startups of the late '90s? > > Rich can use his hatred of Apple, compact cameras, plastic and people > unlike him ethnically to make any "comparison" you can think of. > > Maybe he shorted the stock at $40.... > He might just be an unhappy malcontent needing Prozac... Oh wait, Prozac only "works" (self-reported) in about 70% of cases. What he /really/ needs is a new iPhone: http://www.salon.com/life/feature/2010/05/30/iphone_college_students/index.html "72 percent said that their iPhone made them happier." Better than Prozac.
From: Rich on 1 Jun 2010 21:39 Me <user(a)domain.invalid> wrote in news:hu2646$8u3$1(a)news.albasani.net: > On 1/06/2010 4:48 p.m., John McWilliams wrote: >> Me wrote: >>> On 1/06/2010 12:48 p.m., Rich wrote: >>>> >>>> Yeah, I remember worthless, paper companies in the 1990's worth >>>> more in the stock market than GE because had high-tech names and >>>> that impressed morons. F--- Apple. >>>> >>> You can't seriously compare Apple, with revenue of ~$40 billion, >>> income (EBIT) of $11 billion, and profit of ~$8 billion with >>> tech-bubble startups of the late '90s? >> >> Rich can use his hatred of Apple, compact cameras, plastic and people >> unlike him ethnically to make any "comparison" you can think of. >> >> Maybe he shorted the stock at $40.... >> > He might just be an unhappy malcontent needing Prozac... > Oh wait, Prozac only "works" (self-reported) in about 70% of cases. > What he /really/ needs is a new iPhone: > http://www.salon.com/life/feature/2010/05/30/iphone_college_students/in > dex.html "72 percent said that their iPhone made them happier." > Better than Prozac. > 72% have IQ's under 95...
From: Mike Russell on 1 Jun 2010 22:18 > On 2010-06-01 18:39:41 -0700, Rich <none(a)nowhere.com> said: >> 72% have IQ's under 95... On Tue, 1 Jun 2010 19:03:00 -0700, Savageduck wrote: > ...and you know that little fact, how? It's part of the definition of IQ. http://www.iqcomparisonsite.com/IQBasics.aspx -- Mike Russell - http://www.curvemeister.com
From: Twibil on 1 Jun 2010 22:58 On Jun 1, 6:39 pm, Rich <n...(a)nowhere.com> wrote: > > > > dex.html "72 percent said that their iPhone made them happier." > > Better than Prozac. > > 72% have IQ's under 95... Yup. But alas for you they're not the same 72%.
From: Peter Irwin on 1 Jun 2010 23:10
Twibil <nowayjose6(a)gmail.com> wrote: > On Jun 1, 6:39?pm, Rich <n...(a)nowhere.com> wrote: >> >> >> > dex.html "72 percent said that their iPhone made them happier." >> > Better than Prozac. >> >> 72% have IQ's under 95... > > Yup. That can't be right. IQ scores ideally have a mean of 100 and a standard deviation of 15. So the score that 72% of people score less than should be a little more than one sigma above 100. Peter. |