From: Ron on 9 Aug 2010 01:38 On 8/8/2010 7:13 PM, Hal Hersh wrote: > Ron<rmoore85(a)ix.netcom.com> wrote in news:VoGdnQbIRMw- > 0cPRnZ2dnUVZ_oKdnZ2d(a)earthlink.com: > >> http://dottech.org/freebies/17360 > > Thanks so much; that's just what I needed! YW. I think you'll like their burning s/w. Ron
From: Victek on 9 Aug 2010 19:17 >It depends on how much information you want from your software. Imgburn >gives you access to /many/ boxes that supply all kinds of data about your >drive, media, etc., etc. Ashampoo is very GUI-based; most of the work is >"under the hood". From personal experience with their commercial burning >product, it's /very/ easy to use. As to the final results, I suspect that >depends on your hardware and OS. AFAIK, the last update of Imgburn made it >compatible with Win7. I'm not sure if Burning Studio 2010 is compatible >with 64-bit Win 7, but it works with 32-bit. > >hth >Ron > .. I've been using Ashampoo Burning Studio 2009 (free product) on Windows 7 x64 and it worked fine. This new 2010 "advanced" version installed fine and looks pretty much like the 2009 product with a new coat of paint. That's fine - I like paint <g>, and perhaps it has been tweaked for compatibility and speed as they say.
First
|
Prev
|
Pages: 1 2 3 Prev: No subject Next: Browser Comparison: What's the Most Pixel-Friendly Browser? |