Prev: No subject
Next: Browser Comparison: What's the Most Pixel-Friendly Browser?
From: Ron on 9 Aug 2010 01:38
On 8/8/2010 7:13 PM, Hal Hersh wrote:
> Ron<rmoore85(a)ix.netcom.com> wrote in news:VoGdnQbIRMw-
> 0cPRnZ2dnUVZ_oKdnZ2d(a)earthlink.com:
>
>> http://dottech.org/freebies/17360
>
> Thanks so much; that's just what I needed!

YW. I think you'll like their burning s/w.

Ron
From: Victek on 9 Aug 2010 19:17
>It depends on how much information you want from your software. Imgburn
>gives you access to /many/ boxes that supply all kinds of data about your
>drive, media, etc., etc. Ashampoo is very GUI-based; most of the work is
>"under the hood". From personal experience with their commercial burning
>product, it's /very/ easy to use. As to the final results, I suspect that
>depends on your hardware and OS. AFAIK, the last update of Imgburn made it
>compatible with Win7. I'm not sure if Burning Studio 2010 is compatible
>with 64-bit Win 7, but it works with 32-bit.
>
>hth
>Ron
>
..
I've been using Ashampoo Burning Studio 2009 (free product) on Windows 7 x64
and it worked fine. This new 2010 "advanced" version installed fine and
looks pretty much like the 2009 product with a new coat of paint. That's
fine - I like paint <g>, and perhaps it has been tweaked for compatibility
and speed as they say.

First  |  Prev  | 
Pages: 1 2 3
Prev: No subject
Next: Browser Comparison: What's the Most Pixel-Friendly Browser?