Prev: WHAT’S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, May 7, 2010 Washington, DC
Next: Global Warming - ozone hole?
From: nuny on 8 May 2010 06:46 Dark matter turbines! Seriously, if Dark Matter exists, then there ought to be a local "breeze" of it. If we can directly detect it, a detection technology ought to yield a method of converting the "breeze" to usable energy en masse. Is the breeze constant, or "lumpy"? Is it "organized"? Could it be alive? Using said turbines might be perceived as an act of war since they'd by definition interfere with the flow. For those obsessed with politics, Republicans would call it "harvesting", while Liberals would call it "exploiting". Politics aside, is the physics sensible? What's the potential yield? Mark L. Fergerson
From: James Harris News Update on 8 May 2010 14:33 X-Trace: posting.google.com 1273315586 5315 127.0.0.1 (8 May 2010 10:46:26 GMT)
From: Uncle Al on 8 May 2010 15:59 "nuny(a)bid.nes" wrote: > > Dark matter turbines! > > Seriously, if Dark Matter exists, then there ought to be a local > "breeze" of it. > > If we can directly detect it, a detection technology ought to yield > a method of converting the "breeze" to usable energy en masse. [snip] 1) Solar neutrinos: 323 billion/in^2-sec, hard by lightspeed; 87 curies/in^2. Nature 375(6526) 29 (1995) 2) Interaction cross-section. 3) Tch tch. -- Uncle Al http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/ (Toxic URL! Unsafe for children and most mammals) http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/qz4.htm
From: john on 8 May 2010 23:00 On May 8, 1:59 pm, Uncle Al <Uncle...(a)hate.spam.net> wrote: > "n...(a)bid.nes" wrote: > > > Dark matter turbines! > > > Seriously, if Dark Matter exists, then there ought to be a local > > "breeze" of it. > > > If we can directly detect it, a detection technology ought to yield > > a method of converting the "breeze" to usable energy en masse. > > [snip] > > 1) Solar neutrinos: 323 billion/in^2-sec, hard by lightspeed; 87 > curies/in^2. > > Nature 375(6526) 29 (1995) > > 2) Interaction cross-section. snip 100% within the horizon of black holes
|
Pages: 1 Prev: WHAT’S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, May 7, 2010 Washington, DC Next: Global Warming - ozone hole? |