From: nuny on
Dark matter turbines!

Seriously, if Dark Matter exists, then there ought to be a local
"breeze" of it.

If we can directly detect it, a detection technology ought to yield
a method of converting the "breeze" to usable energy en masse.

Is the breeze constant, or "lumpy"? Is it "organized"? Could it be
alive? Using said turbines might be perceived as an act of war since
they'd by definition interfere with the flow. For those obsessed with
politics, Republicans would call it "harvesting", while Liberals would
call it "exploiting".

Politics aside, is the physics sensible?

What's the potential yield?


Mark L. Fergerson
From: James Harris News Update on
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1273315586 5315 127.0.0.1 (8 May 2010 10:46:26
GMT)


From: Uncle Al on
"nuny(a)bid.nes" wrote:
>
> Dark matter turbines!
>
> Seriously, if Dark Matter exists, then there ought to be a local
> "breeze" of it.
>
> If we can directly detect it, a detection technology ought to yield
> a method of converting the "breeze" to usable energy en masse.
[snip]

1) Solar neutrinos: 323 billion/in^2-sec, hard by lightspeed; 87
curies/in^2.

Nature 375(6526) 29 (1995)

2) Interaction cross-section.
3) Tch tch.

--
Uncle Al
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/
(Toxic URL! Unsafe for children and most mammals)
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/qz4.htm
From: john on
On May 8, 1:59 pm, Uncle Al <Uncle...(a)hate.spam.net> wrote:
> "n...(a)bid.nes" wrote:
>
> >   Dark matter turbines!
>
> >   Seriously, if Dark Matter exists, then there ought to be a local
> > "breeze" of it.
>
> >   If we can directly detect it, a detection technology ought to yield
> > a method of converting the "breeze" to usable energy en masse.
>
> [snip]
>
>    1) Solar neutrinos:  323 billion/in^2-sec, hard by lightspeed; 87
> curies/in^2.
>
> Nature 375(6526) 29 (1995)
>
>    2) Interaction cross-section.
snip

100% within the horizon of black holes