From: liquidator on

"Orlando Enrique Fiol" <ofiol(a)verizon.net> wrote in message
news:MPG.25da95fb3c5ecbef9898b2(a)news.albasani.net...
> liquidator <mikeh(a)mad.scientist.com> wrote:
>>Well it proves you only email people when you want something...
>
> If I emailed you to be purely sociable, would you respond?
>
>>The only think that will convince me is your future behavior. Right now I
>>think it's a case of the lady doth protest too much...
>
>
> Guess what, I'm not out to convince you or anyone else with my future or
> past
> behavior. I am a free agent, a fully grown and mature adult who takes full
> responsibility for my actions whether or not you approve of them. If you
> were
> in fact correct that my primary aim was to hit on Danielle by asking her
> to
> email me privately because she has hidden her email address, I am free to
> do
> that in the United States of America.
>
> Orlando

Completely right, and I am completely free to call you on it.

You sure are upset for someone not guilty.

I think everybody here has you figured out.


From: TwentyFour on
"Sean Conolly" <sjconolly_98(a)yaaho.com> wrote:
> "Orlando Enrique Fiol" <ofiol(a)verizon.net> wrote in message
> news:MPG.25da5b225e9d07779898b0(a)news.albasani.net...
> > Joe Kotroczo <kotroczo(a)mac.com> wrote:
> >>Except that your terminology is wrong. Phrases like "headroom for
> > > cut"
> >>don't
> >>make any sense.
> >
> > Headroom, in terms of boost, is intended to prevent digital clipping
> > or
> > distortion.
>
> A little awkward, but OK.
>
> > In terms of cut, headroom conversely prevents the hollowing of
> > specific frequency spectra.
>
> That just doesn't make sense any way I try to construe it.
>
> First off, I don't think I've ever used a board with more headroom at
> the
> preamp than the EQ section. The preamp will clip first, and if it does
> you
> turn it down. If the post-EQ signal is too hot and clipping something
> else,
> then you use the fader to pull it down.
>
> The only purpose for the EQ is to reshape the frequency response of
> the
> circuit, to change the tone of the signal. The idea of using EQ to
> control
> headroom sounds like a bad solution to an easy problem - learn how,
> and
> where, to set gain stages properly.
>
> Sean
>
>
>
Agreed.

--
TwentyFour
From: Steve M on
"DanielleOM" wrote:
> When I watch a friend mix I find I see all of the mixer frequency settings
> turned down to about the same spot at 9 o'clock.
>

Simple answer:
If all channels have the EQ dialed to the exact same settings (other than
"0"), the person operating the
console has no business doing so.

--
Steve <snip> McQ


First  |  Prev  | 
Pages: 1 2
Prev: How to turn down work
Next: How to turn down work