Prev: |GG| Re: The detached observer, or semi-bad day in the mountains
Next: Samsung's NX10 mirrorless DSLR may NOT be an enthusiast camera
From: mcp6453 on 17 Jan 2010 10:12
Based on my research, it appears that Fuji digital cameras have excellent low
light performance. Most of our pictures are taken inside, so I'd like to do
better than my Kodak M853. Can someone recommend a Fuji (or other brand) camera
model for $300US or less that is a stellar low light performer?
From: Rich on 17 Jan 2010 16:26
On Jan 17, 10:12 am, mcp6453 <mcp6...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> Based on my research, it appears that Fuji digital cameras have excellent low
> light performance. Most of our pictures are taken inside, so I'd like to do
> better than my Kodak M853. Can someone recommend a Fuji (or other brand) camera
> model for $300US or less that is a stellar low light performer?

A used Nikon D40 or 50. A used Canon Rebel XT.
From: MG on 18 Jan 2010 09:15

"mcp6453" <mcp6453(a)gmail.com> wrote in message
news:NYWdnT96QLh_tc7WnZ2dnUVZ_vWdnZ2d(a)giganews.com...
> Based on my research, it appears that Fuji digital cameras have excellent
> low
> light performance. Most of our pictures are taken inside, so I'd like to
> do
> better than my Kodak M853. Can someone recommend a Fuji (or other brand)
> camera
> model for $300US or less that is a stellar low light performer?


A used Fuji F30 or F31 if you can find one.

Otherwise you can try this one:
http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/fujifilmf200exr/


MG


From: ransley on 18 Jan 2010 15:45
On Jan 17, 3:26 pm, Rich <rander3...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> On Jan 17, 10:12 am, mcp6453 <mcp6...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Based on my research, it appears that Fuji digital cameras have excellent low
> > light performance. Most of our pictures are taken inside, so I'd like to do
> > better than my Kodak M853. Can someone recommend a Fuji (or other brand) camera
> > model for $300US or less that is a stellar low light performer?
>
> A used Nikon D40 or 50.  A used Canon Rebel XT.

Thats a good point, inside P&S just dont cut it for me, they are not
flexible enough in all areas but mainly a dedicated flash cant even be
used, and iso is much better. .
 | 
Pages: 1
Prev: |GG| Re: The detached observer, or semi-bad day in the mountains
Next: Samsung's NX10 mirrorless DSLR may NOT be an enthusiast camera