GETTING RID OF EINSTEIN RELATIVITY
in [Relativity]
|
Prev: What is the Aether?
Next: Debunking Nimtz
From: Dr. Henri Wilson on 22 Nov 2007 18:24 On Thu, 22 Nov 2007 21:43:51 +0000 (UTC), bz <bz+spr(a)ch100-5.chem.lsu.edu> wrote: >HW@....(Dr. Henri Wilson) wrote in >news:t5sbk3pk5rhvnpkqrbfnj0242gi3r52qlj(a)4ax.com: > >> My version of BaTh says that light consists of discreet particle-like >> objects called photons, which possess structure and intrinsic properties > >Henri, I suggest that, to avoid confusion, you call yours pheaux-tons. > >That way, no one is likely to think they have the properties that photons >have. > >> that allow for some kind of internal oscillation. Their total energy is >> partly 'observer speed' dependent because the 'nu' in 'h.nu' is Doppler >> dependent. There is nothing strange about this. > >You can then define a variable called gnu to use instead of the normal nu. >Then your theory will be both gnu and strange. My theory works. Yours doesn't exist... Henri Wilson. ASTC,BSc,DSc(T) www.users.bigpond.com/hewn/index.htm
From: bz on 22 Nov 2007 18:38 HW@....(Dr. Henri Wilson) wrote in news:vr3ck3hl8d19q607b3cp2hcmcm6f6l7lou@ 4ax.com: ..... > My theory works. > > Yours doesn't exist... "Delusions are often functional. A mother's opinions about her children's beauty, intelligence, goodness, et cetera ad nauseam, keep her from drowning them at birth." Robert A. Heinlein -- bz please pardon my infinite ignorance, the set-of-things-I-do-not-know is an infinite set. bz+spr(a)ch100-5.chem.lsu.edu remove ch100-5 to avoid spam trap
From: Bryan Olson on 23 Nov 2007 14:48 Henri Wilson wrote: [...] > BaTh now fully explains Sagnac, most variable star curves, diffraction and > gravitational redshift....as well as any other phenomenon associated with > light. And will probably grow to explain more, as Mr. Wilson notes more observations refuting his theory and hacks in special cases to adjust. > It must be pointed out however that BaTh operates 100% effectively only in pure > vacuum. BaTh operates 100% effectively only in Mr. Wilson's own Visual Basic programs. > Surrounding any large mass, there exists a 'sphere of EM control' that > may act like a weak 'local aether'. In the case of close binary pairs, the > 'spheres' tend to cancel one another out, which is why contact binaries > generally show little or no brightness variation. And we can detect it by noting that if it did not exist, BaTh would be wrong. -- --Bryan
From: Dr. Henri Wilson on 23 Nov 2007 15:33 On Fri, 23 Nov 2007 19:48:51 GMT, Bryan Olson <fakeaddress(a)nowhere.org> wrote: >Henri Wilson wrote: >[...] >> BaTh now fully explains Sagnac, most variable star curves, diffraction and >> gravitational redshift....as well as any other phenomenon associated with >> light. > >And will probably grow to explain more, as Mr. Wilson notes >more observations refuting his theory and hacks in special >cases to adjust. > >> It must be pointed out however that BaTh operates 100% effectively only in pure >> vacuum. > >BaTh operates 100% effectively only in Mr. Wilson's own Visual >Basic programs. > >> Surrounding any large mass, there exists a 'sphere of EM control' that >> may act like a weak 'local aether'. In the case of close binary pairs, the >> 'spheres' tend to cancel one another out, which is why contact binaries >> generally show little or no brightness variation. > >And we can detect it by noting that if it did not exist, BaTh >would be wrong. Do you have anything intelligent to contribute? Henri Wilson. ASTC,BSc,DSc(T) www.users.bigpond.com/hewn/index.htm
From: Bryan Olson on 23 Nov 2007 16:04
"Dr." Henri Wilson asked: > Do you have anything intelligent to contribute? How about: When following up a crank's post, don't expect the crank himself to understand anything. -- --Bryan |