Prev: Fraternal Twins going equally fast at all times?
Next: dimensional analysis of BP's Waxman's arbitraguers' WSUrinal's "cap&tax" nostrum?
From: Simp on 9 Jul 2010 13:08
On 8 Lip, 03:48, "J. Clarke" <jclarke.use...(a)cox.net> wrote:

> > It 'works' because GR don't predicts precession of... Moon.
>
> So you're saying that General Relativity correctly predicts the motion
> of Mercury?  Then what are you on about?

GR predicts optical illusion (but not exactly):

43/415 / 1296000 = 8.0e-8;

dt/t = dr/r = dphi/2pi = pi (v/c)^2;
v = 47.8 km/s;

this is 1/4 Shapiro delay (it's simple Sagnac):
dt/t = 4pi (v/c)^2;

wr = v^2 = GM/r; t = 4r/c;
===================

GR:
dphi/2pi = 3 GM/c^2p = 3/(1-e^2) GM/ac^2;

coincidence: e = ~0.206;
3/(1-e^2) = ~pi;

and you have:
dphi/2pi = pi * GM/ac^2 = pi (v/c)^2;

> > Earth axial precession (equinox): 50.3 arcsec / year.
> > Yes?
>
> > Jupiter - Sun (second body correction):
> > pi/T * m/M = pi/11.86 y /1050 = 52.03 as/ y;
>
> > Earth:
> > pi/1 y * m/M = pi/333000 = 1.95 as / y
>
> > Observed from Earth - difference:
> > ~50 arcsec / year; T = ~25800 years.
>
> > Moon&  Sun tidal forces ->  50.3 ?
> > Maybe... but 0.3;
>
> If you have a point please make it in complete sentences.

From: Peter Webb on 10 Jul 2010 02:12

In the meantime, keep drinking more fermented diarrhea of Einstein the
nitwit, the plagiarist, and the liar from Einstein Dingleberries.
<shrug>

______________________________________________

I'm not sure what you believe about SR. Are there any experimental
predictions of SR which you disagree with, or do you believe that SR makes
100% correct predictions within its domain?




From: Henry Wilson DSc on 10 Jul 2010 18:25
On Sat, 10 Jul 2010 16:12:31 +1000, "Peter Webb"
<webbfamily(a)DIESPAMDIEoptusnet.com.au> wrote:

>
>In the meantime, keep drinking more fermented diarrhea of Einstein the
>nitwit, the plagiarist, and the liar from Einstein Dingleberries.
><shrug>
>
>______________________________________________
>
>I'm not sure what you believe about SR. Are there any experimental
>predictions of SR which you disagree with, or do you believe that SR makes
>100% correct predictions within its domain?

There has never been a believable experiment that supports SR.

Henry Wilson...

........Einstein's Relativity...The religion that worships negative space.
From: eric gisse on 10 Jul 2010 18:51
...@..(Henry Wilson DSc) wrote:

> On Sat, 10 Jul 2010 16:12:31 +1000, "Peter Webb"
> <webbfamily(a)DIESPAMDIEoptusnet.com.au> wrote:
>
>>
>>In the meantime, keep drinking more fermented diarrhea of Einstein the
>>nitwit, the plagiarist, and the liar from Einstein Dingleberries.
>><shrug>
>>
>>______________________________________________
>>
>>I'm not sure what you believe about SR. Are there any experimental
>>predictions of SR which you disagree with, or do you believe that SR makes
>>100% correct predictions within its domain?
>
> There has never been a believable experiment that supports SR.

Coincidentally, Henry Wilson does not believe in any of the experiments that
support SR.

Equally coincidental is the fact that Henry Wilson can't find fault in any
of the experiments that support SR.

>
> Henry Wilson...
>
> .......Einstein's Relativity...The religion that worships negative space.

From: PD on 12 Jul 2010 10:18
On Jul 10, 5:25 pm, ..@..(Henry Wilson DSc) wrote:
> On Sat, 10 Jul 2010 16:12:31 +1000, "Peter Webb"
>
> <webbfam...(a)DIESPAMDIEoptusnet.com.au> wrote:
>
> >In the meantime, keep drinking more fermented diarrhea of Einstein the
> >nitwit, the plagiarist, and the liar from Einstein Dingleberries.
> ><shrug>
>
> >______________________________________________
>
> >I'm not sure what you believe about SR. Are there any experimental
> >predictions of SR which you disagree with, or do you believe that SR makes
> >100% correct predictions within its domain?
>
> There has never been a believable experiment that supports SR.

On the contrary. Lots and lots and lots of physicists believe those
experiments, and for all the reasons that the results of experiments
are typically taken to be credible.

You, on the other hand, apparently have a different metric for what
makes an experimental result credible. I've got no idea what that
metric is, but it is not the one used by physicists.

>
> Henry Wilson...
>
> .......Einstein's Relativity...The religion that worships negative space.

First  |  Prev  | 
Pages: 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
Prev: Fraternal Twins going equally fast at all times?
Next: dimensional analysis of BP's Waxman's arbitraguers' WSUrinal's "cap&tax" nostrum?