Gate resistor
in [Design]
|
Prev: UART Multiplexing
Next: User forum design
From: Tim Williams on 11 Apr 2010 14:08 "John Larkin" <jjlarkin(a)highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote in message news:l9t3s5tormcd2278vt97129udbi0ib2h8b(a)4ax.com... > Something to do with shoot-through? What were the resistor values? Yes. But why? 22 ohms, now 100. Teensy gate, FDPF7N50's. > But you are top posting again. Shows sorry lack of discipline. No. Tim -- Deep Friar: a very philosophical monk. Website: http://webpages.charter.net/dawill/tmoranwms
From: John Larkin on 11 Apr 2010 15:38 On Sun, 11 Apr 2010 13:08:40 -0500, "Tim Williams" <tmoranwms(a)charter.net> wrote: >"John Larkin" <jjlarkin(a)highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote in message >news:l9t3s5tormcd2278vt97129udbi0ib2h8b(a)4ax.com... >> Something to do with shoot-through? What were the resistor values? > >Yes. But why? > >22 ohms, now 100. Teensy gate, FDPF7N50's. > >> But you are top posting again. Shows sorry lack of discipline. > >No. > Shows sorry excess of stubbornness. John
From: John Fields on 11 Apr 2010 17:55 On Sun, 11 Apr 2010 12:38:49 -0700, John Larkin <jjlarkin(a)highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote: >On Sun, 11 Apr 2010 13:08:40 -0500, "Tim Williams" ><tmoranwms(a)charter.net> wrote: > >>"John Larkin" <jjlarkin(a)highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote in message >>news:l9t3s5tormcd2278vt97129udbi0ib2h8b(a)4ax.com... >>> Something to do with shoot-through? What were the resistor values? >> >>Yes. But why? >> >>22 ohms, now 100. Teensy gate, FDPF7N50's. >> >>> But you are top posting again. Shows sorry lack of discipline. >> >>No. >> > >Shows sorry excess of stubbornness. --- I agree with John on this one. If all of the rest of us have agreed to bottom and inline post, why are you the last holdout among the "regulars" who insists on top posting? You're obviously not a newbie and your posts are generally helpful, so why do you make them hard to read? JF
From: a7yvm109gf5d1 on 11 Apr 2010 18:10 On Apr 11, 5:02 am, Tim Williams <tmoran...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > Neet. I increased the gate resistors on a half bridge MOSFET > inverter, and switching loss dropped significantly. > > Tim Neet is a hair removal product.
From: Jamie on 12 Apr 2010 07:00
a7yvm109gf5d1(a)netzero.com wrote: > On Apr 11, 5:02 am, Tim Williams <tmoran...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > >>Neet. I increased the gate resistors on a half bridge MOSFET >>inverter, and switching loss dropped significantly. >> >>Tim > > > Neet is a hair removal product. Is that happen to my head. |