Prev: Outlook Express6 Font and Encoding Questions
Next: informa��es
From: Peter Foldes on 16 Jan 2010 20:59
Are you talking about this Security Release from Microsoft which was published a day
before yesterday which
addresses this issue.

http://www.microsoft.com/technet/security/advisory/979352.mspx



--
Peter

Please Reply to Newsgroup for the benefit of others
Requests for assistance by email can not and will not be acknowledged.

"John Hacker" <Jrxfsgpr(a)googlemaiI.com> wrote in message
news:%23%238n8ovlKHA.1824(a)TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...
> Now this must be the news of 2010
>
> After nearly 10 years of unlimited patches, hotfixes and service Packs, IE is
> still a weak link in recent attacks on Google's systems. Either M$ is now
> threatened by Googles rise to prominence or IE is completely rubbish. Either way
> we should start taking instructions from the German government if this article is
> anything to go by.
>
> <http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/technology/8463516.stm>
>
> Is google's search engine more powerful than M$ Bing?

From: David H. Lipman on 16 Jan 2010 21:27
From: "Hot-text" <hot-text(a)hotmail.com>

| Someone is still running IE 6?
| I RUN IE 6 on Windows 98
| And I not the ONLY ONE!

IE6 SP2 on XP SP3 and loving it.


--
Dave
http://www.claymania.com/removal-trojan-adware.html
Multi-AV - http://www.pctipp.ch/downloads/dl/35905.asp


From: senn on 17 Jan 2010 06:07

"John Hacker" <Jrxfsgpr(a)googlemaiI.com> skrev i meddelelsen
news:%23%238n8ovlKHA.1824(a)TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...
> Now this must be the news of 2010
>
> After nearly 10 years of unlimited patches, hotfixes and service Packs, IE
> is still a weak link in recent attacks on Google's systems. Either M$ is
> now threatened by Googles rise to prominence or IE is completely rubbish.
> Either way we should start taking instructions from the German government
> if this article is anything to go by.
>
> <http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/technology/8463516.stm>
>
> Is google's search engine more powerful than M$ Bing?

The reason of what look likes to you of many more virus
infections in IE browsers are surely a result of the very profound
inegualities in market share. This inegualities is perhaps as profound
as around 1 to 99 or till something around 5 to 99.
That said; you're right on another point. Windows users has been
overloaded with problems araising from the fact that too many new
programs has been sent out having problems, even all formers never
gets fully unbuged. Even far from unbuged. The company apparently
needs money and/or lacks qualified programmers.
And my windows 7 64bit is just as slow as Vista was. In fact, windows 7
is a disguised Vista.
/senn

From: sgopus on 17 Jan 2010 18:22
inegualities? What?

"senn" wrote:

>
> "John Hacker" <Jrxfsgpr(a)googlemaiI.com> skrev i meddelelsen
> news:%23%238n8ovlKHA.1824(a)TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...
> > Now this must be the news of 2010
> >
> > After nearly 10 years of unlimited patches, hotfixes and service Packs, IE
> > is still a weak link in recent attacks on Google's systems. Either M$ is
> > now threatened by Googles rise to prominence or IE is completely rubbish.
> > Either way we should start taking instructions from the German government
> > if this article is anything to go by.
> >
> > <http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/technology/8463516.stm>
> >
> > Is google's search engine more powerful than M$ Bing?
>
> The reason of what look likes to you of many more virus
> infections in IE browsers are surely a result of the very profound
> inegualities in market share. This inegualities is perhaps as profound
> as around 1 to 99 or till something around 5 to 99.
> That said; you're right on another point. Windows users has been
> overloaded with problems araising from the fact that too many new
> programs has been sent out having problems, even all formers never
> gets fully unbuged. Even far from unbuged. The company apparently
> needs money and/or lacks qualified programmers.
> And my windows 7 64bit is just as slow as Vista was. In fact, windows 7
> is a disguised Vista.
> /senn
>
> .
>
From: Twayne on 17 Jan 2010 20:21
In news:67504D2A-8DB6-462E-B728-4248F4840D17(a)microsoft.com,
sgopus <sgopus(a)discussions.microsoft.com> typed:
> inegualities? What?
>
> "senn" wrote:

Good grief Snoopy! You can't figure that out?

>
>>
>> "John Hacker" <Jrxfsgpr(a)googlemaiI.com> skrev i meddelelsen
>> news:%23%238n8ovlKHA.1824(a)TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...
>>> Now this must be the news of 2010
>>>
>>> After nearly 10 years of unlimited patches, hotfixes and service
>>> Packs, IE is still a weak link in recent attacks on Google's
>>> systems. Either M$ is now threatened by Googles rise to prominence
>>> or IE is completely rubbish. Either way we should start taking
>>> instructions from the German government if this article is anything
>>> to go by.
>>>
>>> <http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/technology/8463516.stm>
>>>
>>> Is google's search engine more powerful than M$ Bing?
>>
>> The reason of what look likes to you of many more virus
>> infections in IE browsers are surely a result of the very profound
>> inegualities in market share. This inegualities is perhaps as
>> profound as around 1 to 99 or till something around 5 to 99.
>> That said; you're right on another point. Windows users has been
>> overloaded with problems araising from the fact that too many new
>> programs has been sent out having problems, even all formers never
>> gets fully unbuged. Even far from unbuged. The company apparently
>> needs money and/or lacks qualified programmers.
>> And my windows 7 64bit is just as slow as Vista was. In fact,
>> windows 7 is a disguised Vista.
>> /senn
>>
>> .


First  |  Prev  |  Next  |  Last
Pages: 1 2 3
Prev: Outlook Express6 Font and Encoding Questions
Next: informa��es