From: Paul on
I have been looking at some versions of Garch time series modelling,
and asking questions. However, no one responds to my posts, presumably
because there's a shortage of knowledgeable readers.

I have tried sci.math and sci.stats.math and have posted on
talkstats.com

Can anyone give advice as to how I can get help on relatively advanced
time series questions?

It is not essential that the source of info is free. However,
employing a statistical consultant (or tutor) would be beyond my
budget.

I should probably say what my actual concern is. Here is a copy paste
of an earlier posting. Feel free to recommend books/papers which
might help.

SELF-QUOTE BEGINS
Can anyone guide me to any newbie-ish literature on how to fit garch
parameters (for example in Garch 1,1) to data where a small percentage
of the data (perhaps 0.1%) might be missing or inaccurate.

As I understand it, maximum likelihood techniques are not at all
robust with respect to any erroneous or missing data.

I currently use matlab's garch toolbox to determine the values of the
garch parameters.

Many thanks for your help
SELF-QUOTE ENDS

Many Thanks,

Paul Epstein
From: Samik R. on
On 1/13/2010 3:20 AM, Paul wrote:
> I have been looking at some versions of Garch time series modelling,
> and asking questions. However, no one responds to my posts, presumably
> because there's a shortage of knowledgeable readers.
>
> I have tried sci.math and sci.stats.math and have posted on
> talkstats.com
>
> Can anyone give advice as to how I can get help on relatively advanced
> time series questions?
>
> It is not essential that the source of info is free. However,
> employing a statistical consultant (or tutor) would be beyond my
> budget.
>
> I should probably say what my actual concern is. Here is a copy paste
> of an earlier posting. Feel free to recommend books/papers which
> might help.
>
> SELF-QUOTE BEGINS
> Can anyone guide me to any newbie-ish literature on how to fit garch
> parameters (for example in Garch 1,1) to data where a small percentage
> of the data (perhaps 0.1%) might be missing or inaccurate.
>
> As I understand it, maximum likelihood techniques are not at all
> robust with respect to any erroneous or missing data.
>
> I currently use matlab's garch toolbox to determine the values of the
> garch parameters.
>
> Many thanks for your help
> SELF-QUOTE ENDS
>
> Many Thanks,
>
> Paul Epstein
Time series questions do not get answered in this group that often. You
should try posting at stackoverflow (http://stackoverflow.com/) and tag
appropriately. There are more forecasting people there. Hope this helps.
From: James Beck on
On Thu, 11 Feb 2010 13:50:04 -0700, "Samik R." <samXXX(a)gmail.com>
wrote:

>On 1/13/2010 3:20 AM, Paul wrote:
>> I have been looking at some versions of Garch time series modelling,
>> and asking questions. However, no one responds to my posts, presumably
>> because there's a shortage of knowledgeable readers.
>>
>> I have tried sci.math and sci.stats.math and have posted on
>> talkstats.com
>>
>> Can anyone give advice as to how I can get help on relatively advanced
>> time series questions?
>>
>> It is not essential that the source of info is free. However,
>> employing a statistical consultant (or tutor) would be beyond my
>> budget.
>>
>> I should probably say what my actual concern is. Here is a copy paste
>> of an earlier posting. Feel free to recommend books/papers which
>> might help.
>>
>> SELF-QUOTE BEGINS
>> Can anyone guide me to any newbie-ish literature on how to fit garch
>> parameters (for example in Garch 1,1) to data where a small percentage
>> of the data (perhaps 0.1%) might be missing or inaccurate.
>>
>> As I understand it, maximum likelihood techniques are not at all
>> robust with respect to any erroneous or missing data.
>>
>> I currently use matlab's garch toolbox to determine the values of the
>> garch parameters.
>>
>> Many thanks for your help
>> SELF-QUOTE ENDS
>>
>> Many Thanks,
>>
>> Paul Epstein
>Time series questions do not get answered in this group that often. You
>should try posting at stackoverflow (http://stackoverflow.com/) and tag
>appropriately. There are more forecasting people there. Hope this helps.

He could try googling for robust GARCH. It's a new-ish topic, but
here's one paper:

http://ulises.ic.fcen.uba.ar/preprints/muler-yohai2005.pdf