Prev: Siebel 8.0 Core Consultant Exam Sample Questions Set IV Exam Code: IZ0-202
Next: Pro*cobol Spurious nulls being updated into database
From: Frank van Bortel on 6 Jan 2010 06:18
... wrote:
> Dear All,
> As you know global warming
Explain why the average temperature did not rise the last 12 years

--

Regards,
Frank van Bortel
From: gazzag on 6 Jan 2010 07:51
On 6 Jan, 11:18, Frank van Bortel <frank.van.bor...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> As you know global warming
>
> Explain why the average temperature did not rise the last 12 years
>
> --
>
> Regards,
> Frank van Bortel

12 years out of 4.5 billion is hardly a representative sample though,
eh?

Cheers,
-g
From: Andreas Mosmann on 6 Jan 2010 12:52
gazzag schrieb am 06.01.2010 in
<277248f2-a211-44f5-9779-0912025b4c45(a)h9g2000yqa.googlegroups.com>:

> 12 years out of 4.5 billion is hardly a representative sample though,
> eh?

> Cheers,
> -g
Could you please tell me the oracle version you use and the SQL-
statement, that caused your problem?

Andreas

--
wenn email, dann AndreasMosmann <bei> web <punkt> de
From: joel garry on 6 Jan 2010 13:31
On Jan 6, 3:18 am, Frank van Bortel <frank.van.bor...(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
> .. wrote:
> > Dear All,
> > As you know global warming
>
> Explain why the average temperature did not rise the last 12 years
>

Define average: http://data.giss.nasa.gov/gistemp/graphs/Tvs.year+month.pdf

(My personal view is global warming is well-established, human
activity affecting it is well-established [particularly CO2 v. temp],
but human societal adaptation for it has a long way to go, this
religiousity as implied by the OP is counter-productive.)

jg
--
@home.com is bogus.
Trends! http://data.giss.nasa.gov/gistemp/graphs/
From: Frank van Bortel on 8 Jan 2010 09:07
On 6 jan, 19:31, joel garry <joel-ga...(a)home.com> wrote:
> On Jan 6, 3:18 am, Frank van Bortel <frank.van.bor...(a)gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > .. wrote:
> > > Dear All,
> > > As you know global warming
>
> > Explain why the average temperature did not rise the last 12 years
>
> Define average:  http://data.giss.nasa.gov/gistemp/graphs/Tvs.year+month.pdf
>
> (My personal view is global warming is well-established, human
> activity affecting it is well-established [particularly CO2 v. temp],
> but human societal adaptation for it has a long way to go, this
> religiousity as implied by the OP is counter-productive.)
>
> jg
> --
> @home.com is bogus.
> Trends!http://data.giss.nasa.gov/gistemp/graphs/

It is not well-established. If more CO2 means more heat, why
did that not happen last 10~12 years? Someone is screwing us!
The MC=MH (More CO2 = More Heat) rule is simply not true.
 | 
Pages: 1
Prev: Siebel 8.0 Core Consultant Exam Sample Questions Set IV Exam Code: IZ0-202
Next: Pro*cobol Spurious nulls being updated into database