Prev: JSH: Posting realities, residues result
Next: Posting realities, residues result
From: Transition Zone on 11 Jun 2010 11:19
.Article not found or expired on
Yahoo! News
Showing related results for: http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20100330/bs_afp/usclimatewarmingcomp...
Search Results

Koch Industries: Secretly Funding the Climate Denial Machine ...
US oil company, Koch Industries, donated nearly US$48 million to
organisations spreading anti-global warming propaganda, finds a report
by Greenpeace.
stwr.org/climate-change-environment/... - Cached

US Oil Company Donated Millions to Climate Sceptic Groups ...
Report identifies Koch Industries giving $73m to climate sceptic
groups 'spreading inaccurate and misleading information' A Greenpeace
investigation has
risingtidenorthamerica.org/wordpress/2010/03/31/... - Cached

US "Mad Hatter" Throws a Tea Party for Koch and ExxonMobil. Tags:
Exxonmobil, Skeptic Generated News, US ... company employees posed as
average citizens opposed to climate ...
www.desmogblog.com/location/us - 81k - Cached
Profile: Koch Industries, Inc.
The company began in 1927 when Fred C. Koch developed a better way to
convert heavy oil into gasoline. ... Help us clear the PR pollution
that clouds climate science. ...
www.desmogblog.com/koch-industries-inc - Cached
From: spudnik on 12 Jun 2010 15:02
see the retrospective metastudy on glaciers by S. Fred Singer (and,
it is certainly fun to ask, Did he work for an oil company?, and
not obther with his awesome vitae .-)

thus&so:
well, that's simple-enough; I was
trying to tell if "contradiction to first counterexample"
was a proper indirect proof, but I couldn't even see why
its firstness'd be important.

> that it is the sum of two primes
> *with extra conditions*.

thus&so:
what you have been posting is merely absurd at the syllogistic level,
hence, entirely "silly," where all known properties of
electromagnetism,
which are wavey, dysappear into a loose hydrodynamic metaphor,
replacing "energy" with "aether" -- a quaint mental spazzm. funny, as
all of this could be exposed, merely by taking some aspect
of a real two-hole experiment, like the actual details
of the uncited fullerene set-up, into account.

waves can ne'er be particles, whether a mathematical duality can
be applied in a formularium of a phenomenon a la momentum; for
instance,
How is a water-wave to be known as a particle ... um, a hydron?

look at his sad nonsequiters; yours are only misnomers & oxymora
("global" warming, when insolation is totally differential
from pole to equator e.g.). and, so, What'd you "understood of the
following?"

> A=Mc^2, where A is aether and M is matter,
> the following is easily understood: "If a body gives off the energy L
> in the form of radiation, its mass diminishes by L/c2."

--Stop BP's and Waxman's arbitrageurs' wetdream "Captain Tax as
according to the God-am WSUrinal" -- and they LOVE his '91 bill!
http://wlym.com
From: spudnik on 16 Jun 2010 20:45
it's your turn, dood.

> "If a body gives off the energy L in the form of radiation,
> its mass diminishes by L/c2" -- dimensional analysis, please!

thus&so:
it seems that Kooblee and Androcles and Arindam beleive:
nothing changes, at all, at light speed, even if it is the ultimate
speed. (or,
they think that photons are rocks o'light with no mass nor
momentum .-)

of course, there is nothing unusual about the "symmetric twins, " and
there was ne'er any paradox; even less than with Russell's illiterate,
tenseless ones -- I'm just sayin', all Cretins be liars & me, three!

> http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2008arXiv0804.2008N
> "We introduce a symmetric twin paradox whose solution can not be found
> within the currently accepted provinces of the STR.

thus&so:
doc Atlas, there is no paradox, if you accept that there is no
phenomenon,
including sub-atomic angular momenta, that"goes" faster than light.
see,
it was only a "twin paradox" til explained via Einstein et al's
extension
of Galilean relativity -- a strawman, really.

are you going to argue Ole Roemer's dyscovery of the "retardation"
of light, way back, when ever?

your proposed "balancing" is almost cute, but
iff they accelerate at the same average rate,
there clocks'll be in synch at the rendezvous; so,
you've described a Twins Miming Each Other "experiment,"
a null perfection, unlike M&M's results & their refinements.

just get rid of the useless notion of Minkowski's phase-space, and
you won't have to think so God-am hard about it.

> Go ahead and start the calculation then for the time where each twin
> coast away or towards each other without any acceleration and with non-

--Stop BP's Waxman's arbitrageurs' CAP&TRADE Last Bail-out of Wall
St.,
the City of London and George Soros et al ad vomitorium!
http://larouchepub.com

--Fermat's next theorem!
http://wlym.com
 | 
Pages: 1
Prev: JSH: Posting realities, residues result
Next: Posting realities, residues result