Prev: IEEE1284/USB
Next: what is kernelbase.dll ?
From: petr2 on 26 Oct 2009 11:43 Helo everyone, I noticed that the function GlobalMemoryStatusEx returns non precise results for total memory installed on a machine. I am using the field ullTotalPhys of structure MEMORYSTATUSEX to obtain the installed physical memory. I noticed, that on different machines the results are different. I tested on 5 XP machines in the office, all running XP SP3 x32, and all machines have 1 GB of RAM installed. The results are the following: 1071759360 1063325696 1062756352 1062641664 1073274880 How is it possible that all machines have 1 GB of RAM, and results are not the same for them? Thanks.
From: Boba on 26 Oct 2009 12:05 "petr2" <petr.kizima2(a)gmail.com> wrote in message news:fcbf3f16-5e18-4b30-825f-a667e6aafdc7(a)j19g2000vbp.googlegroups.com... > ... > I am using the field ullTotalPhys of structure MEMORYSTATUSEX to > obtain the installed physical memory. ullTotalPhys is "The amount of actual physical memory, in bytes." not "the installed physical memory". these 2 values may be equal for identical hw configurations, but are seldom the same for dif- ferent ones. Boba.
From: petr2 on 26 Oct 2009 17:06 On 26 oct, 17:05, "Boba" <B...(a)somewhere.net> wrote: > "petr2" <petr.kizi...(a)gmail.com> wrote in message > > news:fcbf3f16-5e18-4b30-825f-a667e6aafdc7(a)j19g2000vbp.googlegroups.com... > > > ... > > I am using the field ullTotalPhys of structure MEMORYSTATUSEX to > > obtain the installed physical memory. > > ullTotalPhys is "The amount of actual physical memory, in bytes." > not "the installed physical memory". these 2 values may be equal > for identical hw configurations, but are seldom the same for dif- > ferent ones. Boba. I see. So what is the best way to get exactly installed memory on a machine?
From: Boba on 27 Oct 2009 02:35 "petr2" <petr.kizima2(a)gmail.com> wrote in message news:e7d256d7-537a-49aa-8059-86b050b2ac80(a)d21g2000yqn.googlegroups.com... > ... > I see. So what is the best way to get exactly installed memory on a > machine? it depends on what you need that number for. from programmer's point of view - this is what this forum is for - you've got it right. from hardware configuration pov - i'd suggest read bios directly and keep in mind that there are combinations of chips that even bios will lie to you about and a special driver might be needed.
From: Pavel Lebedinsky [MSFT] on 27 Oct 2009 23:16
> it depends on what you need that number for. from programmer's point > of view - this is what this forum is for - you've got it right. from > hardware configuration pov - i'd suggest read bios directly On Vista SP1 and later you can also use GetPhysicallyInstalledSystemMemory. -- Pavel Lebedinsky/Windows Kernel Test This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights. |