God doesn't play dice: cause and effect
in [Logic]
|
Prev: NETWORK MARKETING
Next: Please, DO NOT forget the only thing that matters on this planet........................……..
From: sadovnik socratus on 9 May 2010 14:39 God doesn't play dice: cause and effect (causality and dependence) Einstein said "God doesn't play dice" because he didnt accept the probabilistic arguments of quantum theory. He thought that behind the probabilistic arguments of quantum theory some real process is hidden. This real process makes the situation probabilistic. Thinking so - Einstein wasnt alone. P. Langevin told, that to speak about crash of unity between cause and effect is intellectual lechery. And Lorentz, de Broglie, Schrodinger believed that the situation in the micro world can be explained in details. All of them considered that the particles and fields exist in real space and time and they can move from one point to another. And this situation is possible to describe not only probabilistically but in details too. # But other group of scientists didnt agree with them. Their leaders, Bohr and Heisenberg, said in micro world we must refuse to describe particles behaviour to the smallest detail. Here is enough to use Heisenbergs Uncertainty Principle. Most scientists agreed with them saying: There isnt better interpretation quantum physics than Heisenbergs . From time to time somebody tried to give new interpretation and explanation quantum situation (more concrete ) but without success. And at last Feynman said: I think I can safely say that nobody understands quantum mechanics. And somebody agreed with him saying, we cannot understand, but we can accustomed to it. Yes, they accustomed to the paradoxical quantum micro world and now, developing it, they created new paradoxes ( quarks, dark matter/ energy, string theory, new particles, new dimensions and new symmetries . . .and etc) # I try to understand the situation. 1. We have dualistic particle as a math point. 2. We have two kinds of space: a) Minkowski ( -4D) and a its shadow - b) separate independent space and independent time (3D+t) 3. The dualistic particle/wave point can move from one point to other, or (maybe) from one space (-4D) to another (3D+t). # This situation was known from 1908 but it still is unsolved. Is this situation hard puzzle ? Isnt clear that we need to know: dualism of particle,(-4D ) and its shadow (3D+ t) to solve this puzzle problem ? But these categories of being scientists try no debate now. Why? Maybe they are busy solving other problems . . . and . . . .. . . create new paradoxes . . .. . . . . . I dont know. # I remember that about 50 years ago I have read one interesting book. Maybe this book will help me to understand the situation. I must reread it again. Where is it? Here it is: Desiderius Erasmus Roterodamus: The Praise of Folly. ===============. All the best. Socratus.
From: sadovnik socratus on 12 May 2010 07:36
Cause & Effect: Determinism & Probability. 1. Classical physics. Between cause & effect the determining principle acts. Is this principle correct? The classical experiments say: it is correct. 2 Quantum physics. Between cause & effect only probabilistic or statistical principle acts. Is this principle correct? The quantum experiments say: it is correct. 3. Why are they, both, correct? Where their unity? ===========. Socratus. |