Prev: ------------- ---------- conditional impossibility
Next: How Can ZFC/PA do much of Math - it Can't Even Prove PA is Consistent(EASY PROOF)
From: Ludovicus on 26 Jun 2010 07:55 As the primes are of the form 6n+1 and 6n+5 we can build 3 tables of double entry with the combinations: 6n-1, 6m-1 ; 6n-1, 6m+ 1 ; 6n - 1, 6m - 1 . n=1,2,3...m=1,2,3... Example: (For the first table) 5 11 17 23 29 35 40 .....6n -1 5 10 16 22 28 34 40 11 16 22 28 34 40 17 22 28 34 40 .. .. 6m-1 In this manner, the diagonals contains all the even numbers less than 46 formed by the adding of pairs of primes less than 5*5.(That is, without utilizing the composites of the arithmetic progressions) If we form the 36 tables from combinations of the 8 forms: 30n+ 1, 30n +7, 30n+11 30n+13, 30n+17, 30n+19, 30n+23, 30n+29 then we will have the all the even numbers less than 94 formed by the adding of primes less than 7*7. (94 = 2*47) And so on. The next are the 48 forms 210+1, 210+11.....,210+199. Ludovicus
From: Ludovicus on 26 Jun 2010 08:29 On Jun 26, 7:55 am, Ludovicus <luir...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > As the primes are of the form 6n+1 and 6n+5 we can build 3 tables of > double entry > with the combinations: 6n-1, 6m-1 ; 6n-1, 6m+ 1 ; 6n - 1, 6m - > 1 . n=1,2,3...m=1,2,3... > Example: (For the first table) > > 5 11 17 23 29 35 40 .....6n -1 > > 5 10 16 22 28 34 40 > > 11 16 22 28 34 40 > > 17 22 28 34 40 > . > . > 6m-1 > > In this manner, the diagonals contains all the even numbers less than > 46 formed by > the adding of pairs of primes less than 5*5.(That is, without > utilizing the composites > of the arithmetic progressions) > > If we form the 36 tables from combinations of the 8 forms: 30n+ 1, 30n > +7, 30n+11 > 30n+13, 30n+17, 30n+19, 30n+23, 30n+29 then we will have the all the > even numbers > less than 94 formed by the adding of primes less than 7*7. (94 = 2*47) > > And so on. The next are the 48 forms 210+1, 210+11.....,210+199. > Ludovicus CORRIGED VERSION: As the primes are of the form 6n+1 and 6n+5 we can build 3 tables of double entry> with the combinations: 6n-1, 6m-1 ; 6n-1, 6m+1 ; 6n-1, 6m-1 n=1,2,3...m=1,2,3... Example: (For the first table) 5 11 17 23 29 35 40 .....6n-1 5 10 16 22 28 34 40 11 16 22 28 34 40 17 22 28 34 40 . . 6m-1 In this manner, the diagonals contains all the even numbers less than 46 formed by the adding of pairs of primes less than 5*5.(That is, without utilizing the composites of the arithmetic progressions) (46 = 2*23) If we form the 66 tables from combinations of the 8 forms: 30n+ , 30n +7 30n+11 30n+13, 30n+17, 30n+19, 30n+23, 30n+29 plus the former 3 then we will have the all the even numbers less than 94 formed by the adding of primes less than 7*7. (94 = 2*47) And so on. The next are the 48 forms 210+1, 210+11.....,210+199 plus the former 11. That is 59*60/2 tables = 1770 producing the 226 even number resulting by the adding of the primes < 11*11. (226 = 2*113) Ludovicus
From: curious george on 26 Jun 2010 14:27 "Ludovicus" <luiroto(a)yahoo.com> wrote in message news:3e331e6c-8112-47f0-bde6-f88f17425e62(a)b35g2000yqi.googlegroups.com... On Jun 26, 7:55 am, Ludovicus <luir...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > As the primes are of the form 6n+1 and 6n+5 we can build 3 tables of > double entry > with the combinations: 6n-1, 6m-1 ; 6n-1, 6m+ 1 ; 6n - 1, 6m - > 1 . n=1,2,3...m=1,2,3... > Example: (For the first table) > > 5 11 17 23 29 35 40 .....6n -1 > > 5 10 16 22 28 34 40 > > 11 16 22 28 34 40 > > 17 22 28 34 40 > . > . > 6m-1 > > In this manner, the diagonals contains all the even numbers less than > 46 formed by > the adding of pairs of primes less than 5*5.(That is, without > utilizing the composites > of the arithmetic progressions) > > If we form the 36 tables from combinations of the 8 forms: 30n+ 1, 30n > +7, 30n+11 > 30n+13, 30n+17, 30n+19, 30n+23, 30n+29 then we will have the all the > even numbers > less than 94 formed by the adding of primes less than 7*7. (94 = 2*47) > > And so on. The next are the 48 forms 210+1, 210+11.....,210+199. > Ludovicus CORRIGED VERSION: As the primes are of the form 6n+1 and 6n+5 we can build 3 tables of double entry> with the combinations: 6n-1, 6m-1 ; 6n-1, 6m+1 ; 6n-1, 6m-1 n=1,2,3...m=1,2,3... Example: (For the first table) 5 11 17 23 29 35 40 .....6n-1 5 10 16 22 28 34 40 11 16 22 28 34 40 17 22 28 34 40 . . > 6m-1 > In this manner, the diagonals contains all the even numbers less than > 46 formed by the adding of pairs of primes less than 5*5.(That is, > without > utilizing the composites of the arithmetic progressions) (46 = 2*23) > If we form the 66 tables from combinations of the 8 forms: 30n+ , 30n > +7 > 30n+11 30n+13, 30n+17, 30n+19, 30n+23, 30n+29 plus the former 3 > then we will have the all the even numbers less than 94 formed by the > adding of primes less than 7*7. (94 = 2*47) > And so on. The next are the 48 forms 210+1, 210+11.....,210+199 plus > the > former 11. That is 59*60/2 tables = 1770 producing the 226 even > number > resulting by the adding of the primes < 11*11. (226 = 2*113) > Ludovicus not sure I understand why you needed to consider the 30n+....and the 210+ etc. the 6n+/-1 has all the primes ( except 2 and 3) so you should be able to show that using only these two progressions you can produce all the even numbers.
From: Ludovicus on 27 Jun 2010 04:33
On Jun 26, 2:27 pm, "curious george" <bu...(a)bunch.net> wrote: > > not sure I understand why you needed to consider the 30n+....and the 210+ > etc. > the 6n+/-1 has all the primes ( except 2 and 3) so you should be able to > show that using only these two progressions you can produce all the even > numbers.- Hide quoted text - > Remember that I must to evite the use of composites in the sums, because someone can argument that a diagonal was produced with composite only. The composites in 6n+1 begin in 25 but in 30n+1 in 49 |