From: bigbrownbeastie on
On Jan 24, 6:01 pm, larwe <zwsdot...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> On Jan 24, 5:39 am, bigbrownbeastie
>
> <bigbrownbeastiebigbrownf...(a)googlemail.com> wrote:
> > >http://members.iinet.net.au/~spam/
>
> > no content
>
> What, in the name of all that's holy would possess you to click on a
> URL in a spam posting? At best it's an AdSense splog; at worst, it's a
> malware vector.

With a properly protected browser you will not get malware by visiting
and URL.
From: Tressie on

"bigbrownbeastie" <bigbrownbeastiebigbrownface(a)googlemail.com> wrote in
message
news:b4abd1e3-5dc8-4404-842a-22b1044d4b6c(a)k35g2000yqb.googlegroups.com...
On Jan 24, 6:01 pm, larwe <zwsdot...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> On Jan 24, 5:39 am, bigbrownbeastie
>
> <bigbrownbeastiebigbrownf...(a)googlemail.com> wrote:
> > >http://members.iinet.net.au/~spam/
>
> > no content
>
> What, in the name of all that's holy would possess you to click on a
> URL in a spam posting? At best it's an AdSense splog; at worst, it's a
> malware vector.

With a properly protected browser you will not get malware by visiting
and URL.


Hi BBB,

Yeah, I thought your comment on my new website was pretty accurate, and
inoffensively neutral. I can understand the larwe's swipe concerning my
spammy mistake, but I couldn't really grasp where you drew heat also. I
guess there is plenty of room for such diversity of opinion. The Net's a
pretty big place, wouldn't you agree? :-)

Muz.