Prev: Checklist creator program that can print and sort? (i.e., for travel checklist)
Next: SXPasswordSuite 1.1
From: Shadow on 9 Aug 2010 11:27 http://fffff.at/google-alarm/ not tried. []'s
From: VanguardLH on 9 Aug 2010 16:03 Shadow wrote: > http://fffff.at/google-alarm/ > > not tried. > []'s fffff.at = 69.163.224.99 69.163.224.99 = apache2-linus.budapest.dreamhost.com Uh huh. I need to visit a site using a webhoster in Brea, CA USA that has a server in Budapest, Hungary for software the OP can't even be bothered to describe. Here's a tiny bit of what I extracted from the web site using a text-only web browser (SamSpade) for a safe visit: Firefox addon visually & audibly alerts you whenever your personal information is being sent to Google servers. Click here to install Gee, I thought Firefox had some decent adblocker add-ons. Maybe not. In IE8, I just import an .xml file that I created which defines hosts or domains to block using its InPrivate Filter feature (along with a registry edit that makes InPrivate Filter enabled everytime I start IE8) and I have the Google servers listed to get them blocked; however, if the site doesn't function because the Google scripts are blocked and I really want to use that site, I just click in the status bar to temporary toggle off the InPrivate Filter option and refresh the page. If you don't want to do all that, just go get a hosts file that includes the Google hosts, like the MVPs hosts file, to block you from accessing those hosts. So what good is someone coming up to you to say that you've been in a car accident after it already happened? Not much. Same for getting alerted after the fact that a web site you chose to visit happens to use Google's tracking, stats, and mapping services. So you end up getting a Google alerter only for Firefox from a site that instead uses Quantcast's scripts or tags to do their web analytics on your visit (see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantcast). Oh yes, you certainly don't want a site using Google's analytics to collect info about your visit there but instead you surely want some other web analytics company to do that. Uh huh. I jJust found another domain to add to my InPrivate Filter block list. It's already listed in the MVPs hosts file.
From: Shadow on 9 Aug 2010 16:23 On Mon, 9 Aug 2010 15:03:38 -0500, VanguardLH <V(a)nguard.LH> wrote: >Shadow wrote: > >> http://fffff.at/google-alarm/ >> >> not tried. >> []'s (I was honest enough to put "not tried" in the post.) >fffff.at = 69.163.224.99 >69.163.224.99 = apache2-linus.budapest.dreamhost.com > >Uh huh. I need to visit a site using a webhoster in Brea, CA USA that >has a server in Budapest, Hungary for software the OP can't even be >bothered to describe. Do you really think I'm stupid enough to actually visit the site, a site from Budapest, somewhere between Australia and Thailand ? Well, in that general direction. It's probably chockablock with Chinese commies. I just saw a reference to it, and figured maybe someone else would look into it for me. Nobody took the bait. Errrrmm >So what good is someone coming up to you to say that you've been in a car accident after it already happened? All my car accident patients do exactly that. Thanks for checking out the site. []'s
From: VanguardLH on 9 Aug 2010 16:43 Shadow wrote: > VanguardLH wrote: > >> Shadow wrote: >> >>> http:// fffff. at/ google-alarm/ >>> >>> not tried. > > (I was honest enough to put "not tried" in the post.) Oh, "not tried", like that clear, uh huh. Not tried WHAT? Based on the dearth of your details, "not tried" would mean you have not tried the SOFTWARE, not that you haven't *visited* that site. >> fffff.at = 69.163.224.99 >> 69.163.224.99 = apache2-linus.budapest.dreamhost.com >> >> Uh huh. I need to visit a site using a webhoster in Brea, CA USA >> that has a server in Budapest, Hungary for software the OP can't >> even be bothered to describe. > > Do you really think I'm stupid enough to actually visit the site, You were the one promoting it in your post so presumably you knew about the site which you already visited there. You thought your post was actually that detailed that anyone would've understood the purpose of your post (other than to guess you were a spammer)? But I did make a mistake. In my reply, I should've added spaces to make the link unclickable to prevent someone else from accidentally visiting that site. Did it this time.
From: Shadow on 9 Aug 2010 16:43 On Mon, 9 Aug 2010 15:03:38 -0500, VanguardLH <V(a)nguard.LH> wrote: >Shadow wrote: > >> http://fffff.at/google-alarm/ >> >> not tried. >> []'s > >fffff.at = 69.163.224.99 >69.163.224.99 = apache2-linus.budapest.dreamhost.com The story I read: http://edition.cnn.com/2010/TECH/web/08/06/google.alarm/index.html []'s
|
Next
|
Last
Pages: 1 2 Prev: Checklist creator program that can print and sort? (i.e., for travel checklist) Next: SXPasswordSuite 1.1 |