Google vs China ( And the world)
in [Physics]
|
Prev: Quantum Gravity 361.7: Conservation of "Directed Energy" as a Dual Riccati Differential Equation
Next: Sci-fi elementar particles as clogged rubberbands stretched over surface
From: Michael Moroney on 19 Mar 2010 00:20 > Here are some comments from an article about Google's > attempt to instigate conflict between China and America. Proper newsgroups, Tom. Proper newsgroups.
From: betweentheeyes on 19 Mar 2010 08:15 "Tom Potter" <xprivatnews(a)mailinator.com> wrote in message news:hnugka$gtv$3(a)news.eternal-september.org... > Here are some comments <snip> I have some choice comments. Gun group numb nuts.
From: Jaisingh on 20 Mar 2010 01:15 "Tom Potter" <xprivatnews(a)mailinator.com> wrote > Here are some comments from an article about Google's attempt to instigate > conflict between China and America. > > As can be seen, Google has picked up where the Mass Media of the 1900's > left off. > =================================== > > I love living in China! I love it love smoking in the bar! I love all the > business opportunities and all the money in This AWESOME ECONOMY. I love > how the police never bother anyone unless they are committing serious > crimes. I LOVE THAT I CAN DO WHAT I WANT AS LONG AS I AM NOT COMMITTING > SERIOUS CRIMES. I don't care that I can't talk bad about the government of > China cause I have NOTHING BAD TO SAY. snip snip snip ... OK, we get the idea, nice. A great place to do business for sure and possibly become rich. But what happens when you commit crimes that are *not serious*? A little bribe will do? So just like here therefore (if you know how to proceed).
From: Brad Guth on 20 Mar 2010 10:21 On Mar 19, 9:15 pm, "Jaisingh" <jantar(a)mantar> wrote: > "Tom Potter" <xprivatn...(a)mailinator.com> wrote > > > Here are some comments from an article about Google's attempt to instigate > > conflict between China and America. > > > As can be seen, Google has picked up where the Mass Media of the 1900's > > left off. > > =================================== > > > I love living in China! I love it love smoking in the bar! I love all the > > business opportunities and all the money in This AWESOME ECONOMY. I love > > how the police never bother anyone unless they are committing serious > > crimes. I LOVE THAT I CAN DO WHAT I WANT AS LONG AS I AM NOT COMMITTING > > SERIOUS CRIMES. I don't care that I can't talk bad about the government of > > China cause I have NOTHING BAD TO SAY. > > snip snip snip ... > > OK, we get the idea, nice. A great place to do business for sure > and possibly become rich. > > But what happens when you commit crimes that are *not serious*? > A little bribe will do? > > So just like here therefore (if you know how to proceed). Correct. (just like here, it's who you know and how much loot you represent) When's the last time if ever a Rothschild did any hard time for their crimes against humanity? ~ BG
From: Kunt100 on 21 Mar 2010 02:29
On 21 mrt, 04:43, "Tom Potter" <xprivatn...(a)mailinator.com> wrote: > "Sendme" <sendmesomemorespa...(a)gmail.com> wrote in message > > news:07e337f5-954a-45f8-89cf-f8304ef57593(a)t23g2000yqt.googlegroups.com... > > > > >On 20 mrt, 10:53, "Tom Potter" <xprivatn...(a)mailinator.com> wrote: > >> "Brad Guth" <bradg...(a)gmail.com> wrote in message > > >>news:012ad20d-9788-4224-b39d-24b36a257776(a)t9g2000prh.googlegroups.com.... > > >> >The US is currently and for the remainder of this decade in a world of > >> >hurt (mostly our own fault), and as you say China is well on their way > >> >to becoming the global superpower that really doesn't need Google > >> >because they'll likely own or surpass Google within a few years. It > >> >seems our productivity to the world has become least important, > >> >meaning if America ceased to exist or function, the world could > >> >manage. > > >> >Our form of censorship and its enforcement is cloaked behind shadows > >> >of nondisclosure and need-to-know policies, and otherwise it depends > >> >on who you are and/or who you know that matters most. However, we can > >> >individually speak extremely negatively and/or incorrectly about our > >> >government, as long as mainstream media and our public textbooks never > >> >reflect such wordage as honest interpretations that need to be taken > >> >seriously. We also have a long standing policy of selective > >> >obfuscation, excluding and denial that is permitted by those in public > >> >office, so as to selectively include/exclude whatever evidence makes > >> >their problems either go away or get the most public funded support > >> >for whatever our leaders care to do. > > >> >As long as you're in charge of whatever the public gets to see and > >> >read about, American truth is flexible, and it can be as unsupported > >> >by objective evidence and facts as you like. In other words, the NO > >> >FLY list of what mainstream media can not report on is much greater > >> >than whatever can be reported and otherwise recorded within our > >> >textbooks unless it's faith-based approved as pro-Semitic and/or > >> >politically correct. > > >> >Question; How much of the newsgroup "soc.culture.china" is open for > >> >those of China to utilize? > > >> > ~ BG > > >> The eternal-september news server has about 38000 > >> articles and as far as I know, anyone can read and comment > >> on any of the articles. > > >> China makes an effort to prevent Google > >> from instigating conflict among their people, > >> and from profiting from pornography. > > >> I suggest that denying people access to pornography > >> and the instigation of conflict is on the same order > >> as denying folks the right to smoke in public places, > >> to play loud boom boxes, litter, walk their dogs > >> on the lawns of neighbors, etc. > > >> Face the face, the Mass Media and Google hype > >> about FREE SPEECH is a buzz word that means > >> Google and the Mass Media want to manipulate > >> and control you, and steal your assets. > >> so they can steal your work product. > > >> Note that I have been banned by Google > >> and not only denied free speech by Google, > >> they even smear me by declaring that I > >> have been "BANNED by Google", > > >> and they censor my posts making it hard for > >> folks to find them. > > >> I have far more free speech in China than I do on Google. > > >> -- > >> Tom Potter > > >They have not smeared you. You HAVE been banned by Google and they are > >reporting something that is true. To "smear" means to make slanderous > >statements about a person. Both libel and slander require, by > >definition, that the statement in question is untrue. > > >You may be able to argue that the act of banning you was slanderous - > >it lowers your reputation in the opinion of the average reader. Given > >that the average reader (a user of Usenet) will probably have been > >exposed to the lies, abuse, bigotry and hatred that you post, it would > >be unlikely that a court in the USA or GB (the countries with the most > >far reaching laws of defamation) would find that your reputation could > >be damaged any further. > > >Besides, to make use of the jurisdiction of either of those two > >countries you would have to expose yourself to the danger of being > >arrested for the criminally anti-semitic nature of a large proportion > >of your postings. Try and pursue an action aginst Google - it would be > >fun to watch. Promise to represent youself, though! > > My Jewish pal Justin Lewis makes a good point > when he points out that Jews will do anything to > prevent folks from expressing FACTS > that expose the lie that Jews are "virtuous victims". Fact: 1) you do not know the meaning of the word smear. 2) you post anti-semitic material that would lead to your criminal conviction in the majority of developed countries 3) your postings which I listed above remain unsubstianted lies (your purported correlation of declining life expectancy and the number of Jewish doctors in the USA turned out to be pure religious abuse). The rest of your posting is your normal repeat bigotted unsubsantiated anti-semitic hatred. Idiot. Your assumption (incorrect) about my religion is not relevant - why do you insist on posting that? |