Prev: Solving Euler beam differential equation with applied moment as input
Next: Quantum Spin Matrix-
From: Benj on 10 Dec 2009 01:27
On Dec 9, 10:10 pm, Igor <thoov...(a)excite.com> wrote:

> Remind me, which one denies GW altogether?  That naughty librarian
> should know better.  She's completely embarrased herself way too many
> times to count.  Even McCain thinks she's an idiot now.

Oh sure, Igor. Just trot out that liberal chauvinist sexist card. Tell
her to go back to the kitchen and bake cookies. And while you are at
it, tell us again how one cannot see Russia from Alaska. I thought you
Lib Wingers all considered yourselves "educated" and smarter than the
peons you are born to rule? And while we are on the subject of
morons. After Algore finishes telling us how he invented the Internet
and AGW, perhaps he can explain to us how the polar ice caps are
melting at fantastic rates endangering all the polar bears, but
somehow all that water has not changed the rate of sea level rise
beyond it's normal rate going on since 1900.

Proof: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Current_sea_level_rise

8 inches per CENTURY for the last century. NO hockey stick. NO
"climate refugees" as the breathless media have been promoting.

Both THEY and YOU are idiots.

And while you are embarrassing yourself in an international public
forum, perhaps YOU need a trip to the library to learn how to spell
"embarrassed". You'll find it in the dictionary. It's a word I think
you are going to need to use a LOT. Illiterate cretin.
From: Androcles on 10 Dec 2009 01:44

"Benj" <bjacoby(a)iwaynet.net> wrote in message
news:eaf9df60-33b6-4aa2-8360-70276aa6a3cf(a)j14g2000yqm.googlegroups.com...
On Dec 9, 10:10 pm, Igor <thoov...(a)excite.com> wrote:

> Remind me, which one denies GW altogether? That naughty librarian
> should know better. She's completely embarrased herself way too many
> times to count. Even McCain thinks she's an idiot now.

Oh sure, Igor. Just trot out that liberal chauvinist sexist card. Tell
her to go back to the kitchen and bake cookies. And while you are at
it, tell us again how one cannot see Russia from Alaska. I thought you
Lib Wingers all considered yourselves "educated" and smarter than the
peons you are born to rule? And while we are on the subject of
morons. After Algore finishes telling us how he invented the Internet
and AGW, perhaps he can explain to us how the polar ice caps are
melting at fantastic rates endangering all the polar bears, but
somehow all that water has not changed the rate of sea level rise
beyond it's normal rate going on since 1900.

Proof: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Current_sea_level_rise

8 inches per CENTURY for the last century. NO hockey stick. NO
"climate refugees" as the breathless media have been promoting.

Both THEY and YOU are idiots.

And while you are embarrassing yourself in an international public
forum, perhaps YOU need a trip to the library to learn how to spell
"embarrassed". You'll find it in the dictionary. It's a word I think
you are going to need to use a LOT. Illiterate cretin.
==============================================
Ivan and Pyotr can see Alaska from their house.




From: nuny on 10 Dec 2009 03:58
On Dec 9, 7:10 pm, Igor <thoov...(a)excite.com> wrote:
> On Dec 9, 9:28 pm, "n...(a)bid.nes" <alien8...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > On Dec 9, 3:07 pm, Just A Guy <Jus...(a)hushmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > NBC News and msnbc.com, Updated: December 9, 2009 2:27 PM
>
> > > Gore rebuts Palin's climate claims
>
> >   Remind me; which one has a huge financial stake in AGW?
>
> Remind me, which one denies GW altogether?

Neither. From the OPs cited source which you apparently failed to
read:

'Palin said she's personally witnessed "the impact of changing
weather patterns." But she said that "while we recognize the
occurrence of these natural, cyclical environmental trends, we can't
say with assurance that man's activities cause weather changes." '

It's the "A" part of "AGW" she doesn't buy.

I snipped all your typical Liberal hate speech. You might want to
avoid embarrassing yourself in the future.

Now, again; which one has a huge financial stake in AGW?


Mark L. Fergerson
From: Yousuf Khan on 10 Dec 2009 04:10
Just A Guy wrote:
> In a piece titled "Copenhagen's Political Science," the former Alaska
> governor charged that "leading climate 'experts'" have "destroyed
> records, manipulated data to 'hide the decline' in global
> temperatures, and tried to silence their critics by preventing them
> from publishing in peer-reviewed journals."

The frontier-state beauty queen is right, her handlers have written a
good piece, and she delivered it just right.

Wish we had more credible spokespeople than these, though. Oh well, you
gotta start with beauty queens, and eventually maybe rock stars will
join in.

> Gore said Wednesday that the scientific community has worked
> intensively on the issue for twenty years. "It's a principle in
> physics," he told Mitchell. "It's like gravity, it exists."

Uhh, it's like Dark Matter, we're not sure what the hell it is. Or if it
even is anything.

Yousuf Khan
From: jmfbahciv on 10 Dec 2009 08:05
nuny(a)bid.nes wrote:
> On Dec 9, 3:07 pm, Just A Guy <Jus...(a)hushmail.com> wrote:
>> NBC News and msnbc.com, Updated: December 9, 2009 2:27 PM
>>
>> Gore rebuts Palin's climate claims
>
> Remind me; which one has a huge financial stake in AGW?
>
>
He's already collected on the carbon derivatives. I wonder
if he's got some puts?

/BAH
First  |  Prev  |  Next  |  Last
Pages: 1 2 3
Prev: Solving Euler beam differential equation with applied moment as input
Next: Quantum Spin Matrix-