From: Will Duquette on 21 Jan 2010 14:52 On Jan 21, 8:35 am, Alexandre Ferrieux <alexandre.ferri...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > On Jan 21, 5:10 pm, Will Duquette <w...(a)wjduquette.com> wrote: > > > On Jan 21, 7:24 am, Alexandre Ferrieux <alexandre.ferri...(a)gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > > Ping ? > > > Pong? > > You didn't say whether the methods I proposed were suited or not... > > -Alex I'm sorry; I haven't had a chance to give them a try yet. For #1, right, it's a topological sort; that's straightforward. The serious question is what to do when there are cycles. My gut feeling is that for my particular problem domain, isolating the cycles as "macro-nodes" probably isn't going to work; most cells are probably linked into one or more cycles, so I'd end up with a few non- cyclic cells at the front end, and then a big rat's nest. (I can't get rid of the cycles, as that's simply the kind of model we're trying to compute.) But suppose the model includes a cycle like this: A => B => C => D => A that is, B's formula depends on A, and C's formula depends on B, and so on. I just want to make sure I'm evaluating these in the order A, B, C, D during each iteration, rather than, say, D, C, B, A. I should make as much progress in one iteration through the model in the former case as I do in four iterations in the latter case. Having detected that there's a cycle, let's say that I break it by removing one of the dependencies, say, C => D. Then it should give me the order D, A, B, C, which is fine.
From: Richard Owlett on 21 Jan 2010 17:17 Will Duquette wrote: > [snip] > > I'm sorry; I haven't had a chance to give them a try yet. For #1, > right, it's a topological sort; that's straightforward. The serious > question is what to do when there are cycles. > > My gut feeling is that for my particular problem domain, isolating the > cycles as "macro-nodes" probably isn't going to work; most cells are > probably linked into one or more cycles, so I'd end up with a few non- > cyclic cells at the front end, and then a big rat's nest. (I can't > get rid of the cycles, as that's simply the kind of model we're trying > to compute.) > [snip] I may be far out in left field, BUT ? Would reformulating the problem as a set of parametric equations help? ie - use a path rather than position as independent variable. Think hysteresis plot. It's been 40+ yrs since I had to consider one and didn't do so well then.
From: Will Duquette on 21 Jan 2010 20:31 On Jan 21, 2:17 pm, Richard Owlett <rowl...(a)pcnetinc.com> wrote: > Will Duquette wrote: > > [snip] > > > I'm sorry; I haven't had a chance to give them a try yet. For #1, > > right, it's a topological sort; that's straightforward. The serious > > question is what to do when there are cycles. > > > My gut feeling is that for my particular problem domain, isolating the > > cycles as "macro-nodes" probably isn't going to work; most cells are > > probably linked into one or more cycles, so I'd end up with a few non- > > cyclic cells at the front end, and then a big rat's nest. (I can't > > get rid of the cycles, as that's simply the kind of model we're trying > > to compute.) > > [snip] > > I may be far out in left field, BUT ? > Would reformulating the problem as a set of parametric equations > help? > > ie - use a path rather than position as independent variable. > Think hysteresis plot. It's been 40+ yrs since I had to consider > one and didn't do so well then. Nope. What I've got is a generalized Leontief input/output model, and I'm definitely using the appropriate algorithm to solve it. I'd just like to be able to optimize it a little. :-)
From: Uwe Klein on 22 Jan 2010 04:11 Will Duquette wrote: > (I can't > get rid of the cycles, as that's simply the kind of model we're trying > to compute.) Do cyclicals converge? ( or where do you set the limit? N cycles? ) uwe
From: Will Duquette on 22 Jan 2010 07:58 On Jan 22, 1:11 am, Uwe Klein <uwe_klein_habertw...(a)t-online.de> wrote: > Will Duquette wrote: > > (I can't > > get rid of the cycles, as that's simply the kind of model we're trying > > to compute.) > > Do cyclicals converge? ( or where do you set the limit? N cycles? ) > > uwe If the model's correct, then generally it converges after some number of iterations through the cells. Naturally, you set a limit on the maximum number of iterations, and you have to take into account that the model might *not* converge.
First
|
Prev
|
Next
|
Last
Pages: 1 2 3 4 Prev: Slimming down a tclkit Next: Help removing remote files with Expect |