Prev: LIVE: Stop ELITE Pedophile Clan in Lithuania and Save A Child NOW!
Next: Martin Gardner dies.
From: eon on 23 May 2010 05:04
On May 23, 9:03 am, eric gisse <jowr.pi.nos...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> Surfer wrote:
>
> [...]
>
> > 3-Space In-Flow Theory of Gravity: Boreholes, Blackholes and the Fine
> > Structure Constant
> >http://arxiv.org/abs/physics/0512109
>
> Look at that, Cahill again.
>
> Tell us, Surfer...
>
> What kind of kickbacks do you get for endlessly citing Cahill?

get lost from my discussions imbecile

you never contribute, but pretend having
a good program helping you not to read

what are you stoopid in some other areas?
From: glird on 23 May 2010 12:51
On May 23, 11:55 am, "Inertial" <relativ...(a)rest.com> wrote:

> It depends on what gravity is.  Only way to find out is to
>make predictions with various models and see what is observed.

Where can one make a prediction, if one's model is so different fro
accepted models that nobody will pay attention?
Here? On these newsgroups?

glird



From: mpc755 on 23 May 2010 13:12
On May 23, 12:51 pm, glird <gl...(a)aol.com> wrote:
> On May 23, 11:55 am, "Inertial" <relativ...(a)rest.com> wrote:
>
> > It depends on what gravity is.  Only way to find out is to
> >make predictions with various models and see what is observed.
>
>  Where can one make a prediction, if one's model is so different fro
> accepted models that nobody will pay attention?
>   Here?  On these newsgroups?
>
> glird

Yes, on these forums. The only possible hope is for younger, open
minded individuals who are not set in their ways to understand a
theory is more correct than what is generally accepted.

What is generally accepted by those set in their ways is mathematics
is nature. Of course, this is absurd nonsense. 'They' mistake wave
functions for physical waves and can not answer simple thought
experiments without have to believe in absurd nonsense such as the
future determining the past.

And over and over again on this and other forums, a simple thought
experiment is asked and simply not answered and then the same poster
who can not answer the simple thought experiment once again responds
with the 'correctness' of their 'understanding' of the Copenhagen
interpretation of QM. If those who choose to believe in the
correctness of what is generally accepted today as how nature
physically behaves can not answer the following thought experiment,
without having to insist the future determines the past, their
'understanding' of the physics of nature is incomplete and incorrect.

A C-60 molecule is in the slit(s). While in the slit(s) detectors are
placed at the exits. The C-60 molecule is always detected exiting a
single slit. A C-60 molecule is in the slit(s). While in the slit(s)
detectors are placed and removed from the exits. The C-60 molecule
creates an interference pattern.

In Aether Displacement, the C-60 molecule has an associated aether
displacement wave. The C-60 molecule is always detected exiting a
single slit because the C-60 molecule always enters and exits a single
slit. If detectors are placed and remove from the exits prior to the
C-60 molecule exiting a single slit and its associated aether
displacement wave exiting the slits then the associated aether
displacement wave creates interference which alters the direction the
C-60 molecule travels. The placement of detectors at the exits at the
time of the associated aether displacement wave exiting the slits and
the C-60 molecule exiting a single slit causes decoherence of the
associated aether displacement wave (i.e. turns the wave into chop)
and there is no interference.
From: whoever on 23 May 2010 19:41
"glird" <glird(a)aol.com> wrote in message
news:aa1150b0-1ad8-482b-a0c8-352341346879(a)d12g2000vbr.googlegroups.com...
> On May 23, 11:55 am, "Inertial" <relativ...(a)rest.com> wrote:
>
>> It depends on what gravity is. Only way to find out is to
>>make predictions with various models and see what is observed.
>
> Where can one make a prediction, if one's model is so different fro
> accepted models that nobody will pay attention?
> Here? On these newsgroups?

Anywhere you want. If your theory correctly predicts (ie explains)
(especially where others don't) then get published.


--- news://freenews.netfront.net/ - complaints: news(a)netfront.net ---
First  |  Prev  | 
Pages: 1 2
Prev: LIVE: Stop ELITE Pedophile Clan in Lithuania and Save A Child NOW!
Next: Martin Gardner dies.